APP vs. MU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APP and MU, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With APP at 121.26 billion USD and MU at 107.11 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
APP’s beta of 2.39 points to much larger expected swings compared to MU’s calmer 1.21, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
Symbol | APP | MU |
---|---|---|
Company Name | AppLovin Corporation | Micron Technology, Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors |
CEO | Mr. Adam Arash Foroughi | Mr. Sanjay Mehrotra |
Price | 358.35 USD | 95.84 USD |
Market Cap | 121.26 billion USD | 107.11 billion USD |
Beta | 2.39 | 1.21 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | April 15, 2021 | June 1, 1984 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APP and MU over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between APP and MU, please refer to the table below.
Symbol | APP | MU |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 63.43 | 22.87 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.43 | 0.88 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 23.61 | 3.42 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 211.64 | 2.20 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 47.87 | 13.61 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 47.30 | 9.14 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 24.23 | 3.66 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.12 | 14.56 |
Dividend Comparison
APP offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while MU provides a 0.48% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
Symbol | APP | MU |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.48% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APP and MU, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- APP is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 6.45), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while MU at 0.31 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
Symbol | APP | MU |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 3.13 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 1.99 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 6.45 | 0.31 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.65 | 0.20 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.41 | 11.94 |