APP vs. JPM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APP and JPM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
JPM towers over APP with a market cap of 725.45 billion USD, roughly 5.98 times the 121.26 billion USD of its peer.
APP rides a wilder wave with a beta of 2.39, hinting at bigger swings than JPM’s steadier 1.07.
Symbol | APP | JPM |
---|---|---|
Company Name | AppLovin Corporation | JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Financial Services |
Industry | Software - Application | Banks - Diversified |
CEO | Mr. Adam Arash Foroughi | Mr. James Dimon |
Price | 358.35 USD | 261.04 USD |
Market Cap | 121.26 billion USD | 725.45 billion USD |
Beta | 2.392 | 1.068 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | April 15, 2021 | March 17, 1980 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APP and JPM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APP and JPM based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- JPM has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -122.34, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, APP at 47.87 maintains a positive cash position.
Symbol | APP | JPM |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 63.43 | 12.33 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.43 | 1.79 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 23.61 | 3.55 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 211.64 | 2.09 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 47.87 | -122.34 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 47.30 | 15.68 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 24.23 | 6.38 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.12 | -220.03 |
Dividend Comparison
APP pays no dividends, focusing all profits on growth, appealing to capital-gains investors. Meanwhile, JPM’s 1.93% yield rewards shareholders, showing financial confidence while supporting objectives—a contrast to APP’s growth-only approach.
Symbol | APP | JPM |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.93% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APP and JPM, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- JPM’s current ratio of 0.58 dips below 1, leaving short-term liabilities larger than current assets—a scenario that could hinge on cash flow support. On the other hand, APP at 1.68 has enough assets to handle its obligations.
- At 0.58, JPM’s quick ratio falls below 0.8, where liquid assets, minus inventory, can’t keep up with short-term bills—possibly riding on cash flow. By contrast, APP hits 1.68, covering its bases comfortably.
- APP racks up a D/E of 6.45 over 3.0, leaning hard into debt and flirting with higher risk. Meanwhile, JPM clocks in at 2.86, staying on firmer ground.
- JPM’s 1.34 sits under 1.5, where earnings hug interest costs too closely—a squeeze if income dips. Meanwhile, APP at 7.41 has room to breathe.
Symbol | APP | JPM |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 0.58 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 0.58 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 6.45 | 2.86 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.65 | 0.23 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.41 | 1.34 |