APP vs. GDDY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APP and GDDY, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
APP dominates in value with a market cap of 121.26 billion USD, eclipsing GDDY’s 26.15 billion USD by roughly 4.64×.
APP’s beta of 2.39 points to much larger expected swings compared to GDDY’s calmer 1.13, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | APP | GDDY |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AppLovin Corporation | GoDaddy Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Adam Arash Foroughi | Mr. Amanpal Singh Bhutani |
| Price | 358.35 USD | 183.49 USD |
| Market Cap | 121.26 billion USD | 26.15 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.39 | 1.13 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | April 15, 2021 | March 31, 2015 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APP and GDDY over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between APP and GDDY, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | APP | GDDY |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 63.43 | 34.44 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.43 | 1.34 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 23.61 | 5.61 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 211.64 | 130.18 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 47.87 | 19.09 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 47.30 | 30.44 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 24.23 | 5.48 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.12 | 18.63 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither APP nor GDDY currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | APP | GDDY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APP and GDDY, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- GDDY’s current ratio of 0.56 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas APP at 1.68 maintains healthy liquidity.
- GDDY posts a quick ratio of 0.56, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while APP at 1.68 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- APP is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 6.45), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while GDDY at 0.45 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
| Symbol | APP | GDDY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 0.56 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 0.56 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 6.45 | 0.45 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.65 | 0.01 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.41 | 9.41 |