APP vs. CRM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APP and CRM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
CRM towers over APP with a market cap of 270.84 billion USD, roughly 2.23 times the 121.26 billion USD of its peer.
APP rides a wilder wave with a beta of 2.39, hinting at bigger swings than CRM’s steadier 1.42.
| Symbol | APP | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AppLovin Corporation | Salesforce, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Adam Arash Foroughi | Mr. Marc R. Benioff |
| Price | 358.35 USD | 282.28 USD |
| Market Cap | 121.26 billion USD | 270.84 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.392 | 1.421 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | April 15, 2021 | June 23, 2004 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APP and CRM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between APP and CRM, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | APP | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 63.43 | 43.68 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.43 | 3.85 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 23.61 | 7.15 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 211.64 | 4.43 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 47.87 | 21.78 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 47.30 | 33.74 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 24.23 | 7.21 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.12 | 21.99 |
Dividend Comparison
APP pays no dividends, focusing all profits on growth, appealing to capital-gains investors. Meanwhile, CRM’s 0.57% yield rewards shareholders, showing financial confidence while supporting objectives—a contrast to APP’s growth-only approach.
| Symbol | APP | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.57% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APP and CRM, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- APP racks up a D/E of 6.45 over 3.0, leaning hard into debt and flirting with higher risk. Meanwhile, CRM clocks in at 0.19, staying on firmer ground.
- CRM’s interest coverage comes up “--”, reflecting interest demands so faint they’re barely there—likely minimal debt or tiny rates—whereas APP at 0.00 cruises past interest with ease.
| Symbol | APP | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 1.06 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 1.06 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 6.45 | 0.19 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.65 | 0.11 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.41 | -- |