APP vs. BRK-B: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APP and BRK-B, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
BRK-B stands out with 1,093.60 billion USD in market value—about 9.02× APP’s market cap of 121.26 billion USD.
APP’s beta of 2.39 points to much larger expected swings compared to BRK-B’s calmer 0.87, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | APP | BRK-B |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AppLovin Corporation | Berkshire Hathaway Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Financial Services |
| Industry | Software - Application | Insurance - Diversified |
| CEO | Mr. Adam Arash Foroughi | Mr. Warren E. Buffett |
| Price | 358.35 USD | 507.03 USD |
| Market Cap | 121.26 billion USD | 1,093.60 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.39 | 0.87 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | April 15, 2021 | May 9, 1996 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APP and BRK-B over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between APP and BRK-B, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | APP | BRK-B |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 63.43 | 13.52 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.43 | 2.80 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 23.61 | 2.63 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 211.64 | 1.67 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 47.87 | 90.64 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 47.30 | 10.33 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 24.23 | 2.83 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.12 | 97.58 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither APP nor BRK-B currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | APP | BRK-B |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APP and BRK-B, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- BRK-B’s current ratio of 0.00 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas APP at 1.68 maintains healthy liquidity.
- BRK-B posts a quick ratio of 0.00, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while APP at 1.68 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- APP is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 6.45), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while BRK-B at 0.19 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
| Symbol | APP | BRK-B |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 6.45 | 0.19 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.65 | 0.11 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.41 | 34.37 |