Seek Returns logo

APO vs. USB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APO and USB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

APO’s market capitalization stands at 82.56 billion USD, while USB’s is 74.68 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

APO’s beta of 1.57 points to significantly higher volatility compared to USB (beta: 1.02), suggesting APO has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAPOUSB
Company NameApollo Global Management, Inc.U.S. Bancorp
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryAsset Management - GlobalBanks - Regional
CEOMarc Jeffrey RowanGunjan Kedia
Price144.47 USD47.93 USD
Market Cap82.56 billion USD74.68 billion USD
Beta1.571.02
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 30, 2011May 3, 1973
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APO and USB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APO vs. USB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

APO

21.02%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
21.02%
Q3
10.69%
Median
0.36%
Q1
-9.97%
Min
-20.30%

In the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, APO’s Return on Equity of 21.02% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

USB

11.44%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
19.20%
Q3
11.87%
Median
9.48%
Q1
6.66%
Min
-0.15%

USB’s Return on Equity of 11.44% is on par with the norm for the Banks - Regional industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Asset Management - Global and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

APO

5.75%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
5.75%
Q3
2.40%
Median
-0.94%
Q1
-4.29%
Min
-7.64%

In the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, APO’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.75% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

USB

4.10%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
13.33%
Q3
7.16%
Median
5.31%
Q1
2.87%
Min
-3.49%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Banks - Regional industry.

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Asset Management - Global and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

APO

14.59%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
14.59%
Q3
-4.29%
Median
-23.18%
Q1
-42.06%
Min
-60.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.59% places APO in the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

USB

15.70%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
32.03%
Q3
21.35%
Median
16.99%
Q1
12.69%
Min
0.27%

USB’s Net Profit Margin of 15.70% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks - Regional industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Asset Management - Global and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

APO

29.75%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
29.75%
Q3
12.31%
Median
-5.13%
Q1
-22.57%
Min
-40.02%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.75% places APO in the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

USB

19.71%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
40.01%
Q3
26.24%
Median
21.14%
Q1
15.85%
Min
1.50%

USB’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.71% is around the midpoint for the Banks - Regional industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Asset Management - Global and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPOUSB
Return on Equity (TTM)21.02%11.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.91%0.99%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)5.75%4.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.59%15.70%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.75%19.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)91.14%59.52%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

APO

0.80

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
1.22
Median
1.08
Q1
0.94
Min
0.80

APO’s Current Ratio of 0.80 falls into the lower quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

USB

0.27

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
0.39
Q3
0.22
Median
0.15
Q1
0.10
Min
0.01

For the Banks - Regional industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

APO

0.59

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
0.59
Q3
0.47
Median
0.34
Q1
0.22
Min
0.09

APO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Asset Management - Global industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

USB

1.28

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
0.81
Median
0.42
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

USB’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Banks - Regional industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.28. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

APO

21.30

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
21.30
Q3
14.75
Median
8.19
Q1
1.64
Min
-4.91

APO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.30 is in the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

USB

0.56

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.84
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
-0.35

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks - Regional industry.

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Asset Management - Global and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPOUSB
Current Ratio (TTM)0.800.27
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.800.27
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.591.28
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.030.11
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.352.90
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)21.300.56

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for APO and USB. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

APO

1.31%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
1.33%
Q3
1.00%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.33%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.31%, APO offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Asset Management - Global industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

USB

4.17%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
11.72%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.00%
Q1
1.68%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.17%, USB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Banks - Regional industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Asset Management - Global and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

APO

33.63%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

APO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.63%, but industry benchmark data for the Asset Management - Global sector is unavailable for comparison.

USB

51.74%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
155.35%
Q3
50.05%
Median
34.14%
Q1
18.61%
Min
0.00%

USB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 51.74% is in the upper quartile for the Banks - Regional industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPOUSB
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.31%4.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.63%51.74%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

APO

23.62

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

APO has a P/E Ratio of 23.62, but a direct industry comparison is not possible as benchmark data for the Asset Management - Global sector is unavailable.

USB

11.17

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
22.32
Q3
15.38
Median
12.31
Q1
10.72
Min
4.30

USB’s P/E Ratio of 11.17 is within the middle range for the Banks - Regional industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

APO

-0.24

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

APO has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -0.24. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

USB

1.11

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.13
Median
1.25
Q1
0.71
Min
0.02

USB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.11 is within the middle range of its peers in the Banks - Regional industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

APO

3.35

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
5.92
Q3
5.27
Median
4.62
Q1
3.97
Min
3.32

In the lower quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, APO’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

USB

1.75

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
4.28
Q3
2.76
Median
2.17
Q1
1.71
Min
0.55

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks - Regional industry.

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

APO

4.72

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
4.67
Q3
3.65
Median
2.63
Q1
1.61
Min
0.59

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management - Global industry.

USB

1.24

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.35
Median
1.09
Q1
0.92
Min
0.33

USB’s P/B Ratio of 1.24 is within the conventional range for the Banks - Regional industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APO vs. USB: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPOUSB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)23.6211.17
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-0.241.11
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.351.75
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.721.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)23.248.97
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)10.2210.92
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.242.39