Seek Returns logo

APO vs. UNMA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APO and UNMA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

APO’s market capitalization of 82.56 billion USD is substantially larger than UNMA’s 14.17 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

APO’s beta of 1.57 points to significantly higher volatility compared to UNMA (beta: 0.41), suggesting APO has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAPOUNMA
Company NameApollo Global Management, Inc.Unum Group 6.250% JR NT58
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryAsset Management - GlobalInsurance - Diversified
CEOMarc Jeffrey RowanNone
Price144.47 USD23.45 USD
Market Cap82.56 billion USD14.17 billion USD
Beta1.570.41
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 30, 2011June 19, 2018
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APO and UNMA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APO vs. UNMA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

APO

21.02%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
21.02%
Q3
10.69%
Median
0.36%
Q1
-9.97%
Min
-20.30%

In the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, APO’s Return on Equity of 21.02% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UNMA

14.78%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
19.59%
Q3
17.66%
Median
12.77%
Q1
7.56%
Min
-4.43%

UNMA’s Return on Equity of 14.78% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Diversified industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

APO

5.75%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
5.75%
Q3
2.40%
Median
-0.94%
Q1
-4.29%
Min
-7.64%

In the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, APO’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.75% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

UNMA

-0.48%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
32.46%
Q3
16.21%
Median
9.46%
Q1
2.09%
Min
-10.51%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Diversified industry.

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

APO

14.59%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
14.59%
Q3
-4.29%
Median
-23.18%
Q1
-42.06%
Min
-60.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.59% places APO in the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UNMA

12.32%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
26.00%
Q3
19.46%
Median
9.37%
Q1
5.55%
Min
-7.05%

UNMA’s Net Profit Margin of 12.32% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Insurance - Diversified industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

APO

29.75%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
29.75%
Q3
12.31%
Median
-5.13%
Q1
-22.57%
Min
-40.02%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.75% places APO in the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UNMA

-2.60%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
44.52%
Q3
25.84%
Median
14.16%
Q1
6.78%
Min
-2.60%

UNMA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.60%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPOUNMA
Return on Equity (TTM)21.02%14.78%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.91%2.89%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)5.75%-0.48%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.59%12.32%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.75%-2.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)91.14%100.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

APO

0.80

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
1.22
Median
1.08
Q1
0.94
Min
0.80

APO’s Current Ratio of 0.80 falls into the lower quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UNMA

--

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
4.41
Q3
4.03
Median
2.86
Q1
2.82
Min
2.82

Current Ratio data for UNMA is currently unavailable.

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

APO

0.59

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
0.59
Q3
0.47
Median
0.34
Q1
0.22
Min
0.09

APO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Asset Management - Global industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UNMA

0.34

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
0.54
Q3
0.39
Median
0.27
Q1
0.21
Min
0.13

UNMA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Insurance - Diversified industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

APO

21.30

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
21.30
Q3
14.75
Median
8.19
Q1
1.64
Min
-4.91

APO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.30 is in the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

UNMA

-1.63

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
19.23
Q3
17.46
Median
7.97
Q1
4.61
Min
-1.63

UNMA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.63. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPOUNMA
Current Ratio (TTM)0.80--
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.80--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.590.34
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.030.06
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.35-8.92
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)21.30-1.63

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for APO and UNMA. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

APO

1.31%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
1.33%
Q3
1.00%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.33%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.31%, APO offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Asset Management - Global industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UNMA

6.66%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
8.16%
Q3
5.54%
Median
2.46%
Q1
1.59%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.66%, UNMA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Insurance - Diversified industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

APO

33.63%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

APO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.63%, but industry benchmark data for the Asset Management - Global sector is unavailable for comparison.

UNMA

18.85%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
101.86%
Q3
53.36%
Median
21.69%
Q1
5.33%
Min
0.00%

UNMA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.85% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Diversified industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPOUNMA
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.31%6.66%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.63%18.85%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

APO

23.62

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

APO has a P/E Ratio of 23.62, but a direct industry comparison is not possible as benchmark data for the Asset Management - Global sector is unavailable.

UNMA

2.66

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
18.52
Q3
16.13
Median
13.33
Q1
9.73
Min
2.62

In the lower quartile for the Insurance - Diversified industry, UNMA’s P/E Ratio of 2.66 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

APO

-0.24

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

APO has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -0.24. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

UNMA

0.25

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
2.07
Median
1.20
Q1
0.77
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Insurance - Diversified industry, UNMA’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.25 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

APO

3.35

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
5.92
Q3
5.27
Median
4.62
Q1
3.97
Min
3.32

In the lower quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, APO’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

UNMA

1.11

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
3.08
Q3
2.00
Median
1.15
Q1
1.07
Min
0.38

UNMA’s P/S Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance - Diversified industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

APO

4.72

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
4.67
Q3
3.65
Median
2.63
Q1
1.61
Min
0.59

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management - Global industry.

UNMA

0.41

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.80
Median
1.59
Q1
1.29
Min
0.74

UNMA’s P/B Ratio of 0.41 is below the established floor for the Insurance - Diversified industry. This may signal that the market is deeply pessimistic or has overlooked the company, potentially offering its asset base at a significant discount.

APO vs. UNMA: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPOUNMA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)23.622.66
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-0.240.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.351.11
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.720.41
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)23.2410.21
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)10.22-48.05
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.241.36