Seek Returns logo

APO vs. RZB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APO and RZB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

APO’s market capitalization of 82.56 billion USD is substantially larger than RZB’s 13.07 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

APO’s beta of 1.57 points to significantly higher volatility compared to RZB (beta: 0.63), suggesting APO has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAPORZB
Company NameApollo Global Management, Inc.Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryAsset Management - GlobalInsurance - Reinsurance
CEOMarc Jeffrey RowanTony Cheng
Price144.47 USD24.78 USD
Market Cap82.56 billion USD13.07 billion USD
Beta1.570.63
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 30, 2011June 13, 2016
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APO and RZB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APO vs. RZB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

APO

21.02%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
21.02%
Q3
10.69%
Median
0.36%
Q1
-9.97%
Min
-20.30%

In the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, APO’s Return on Equity of 21.02% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RZB

7.36%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
18.30%
Q3
14.16%
Median
8.39%
Q1
7.08%
Min
5.91%

RZB’s Return on Equity of 7.36% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

APO

5.75%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
5.75%
Q3
2.40%
Median
-0.94%
Q1
-4.29%
Min
-7.64%

In the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, APO’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.75% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

RZB

0.62%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
126.30%
Q3
60.66%
Median
7.25%
Q1
3.18%
Min
0.62%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

APO

14.59%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
14.59%
Q3
-4.29%
Median
-23.18%
Q1
-42.06%
Min
-60.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.59% places APO in the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RZB

3.77%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
21.27%
Q3
12.90%
Median
9.40%
Q1
5.62%
Min
3.77%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry, RZB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.77% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

APO

29.75%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
29.75%
Q3
12.31%
Median
-5.13%
Q1
-22.57%
Min
-40.02%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.75% places APO in the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RZB

5.12%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
17.83%
Q3
15.41%
Median
8.11%
Q1
5.86%
Min
4.12%

RZB’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.12% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPORZB
Return on Equity (TTM)21.02%7.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.91%0.62%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)5.75%0.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.59%3.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.75%5.12%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)91.14%73.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

APO

0.80

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
1.22
Median
1.08
Q1
0.94
Min
0.80

APO’s Current Ratio of 0.80 falls into the lower quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RZB

--

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

Current Ratio data for RZB is currently unavailable.

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

APO

0.59

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
0.59
Q3
0.47
Median
0.34
Q1
0.22
Min
0.09

APO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Asset Management - Global industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RZB

0.50

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

RZB has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50, but industry benchmarks for the Insurance - Reinsurance sector are currently unavailable for comparison.

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

APO

21.30

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
21.30
Q3
14.75
Median
8.19
Q1
1.64
Min
-4.91

APO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.30 is in the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

RZB

3.41

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
22.46
Q3
18.27
Median
5.57
Q1
4.93
Min
3.41

In the lower quartile for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry, RZB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPORZB
Current Ratio (TTM)0.80--
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.80--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.590.50
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.030.04
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.350.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)21.303.41

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for APO and RZB. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

APO

1.31%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
1.33%
Q3
1.00%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.33%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.31%, APO offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Asset Management - Global industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

RZB

1.80%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
2.38%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.33%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.80%, RZB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Insurance - Reinsurance industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

APO

33.63%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

APO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.63%, but industry benchmark data for the Asset Management - Global sector is unavailable for comparison.

RZB

29.26%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
40.35%
Q3
23.76%
Median
7.09%
Q1
1.73%
Min
0.00%

RZB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.26% is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPORZB
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.31%1.80%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.63%29.26%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

APO

23.62

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

APO has a P/E Ratio of 23.62, but a direct industry comparison is not possible as benchmark data for the Asset Management - Global sector is unavailable.

RZB

16.46

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
16.92
Q3
16.06
Median
12.86
Q1
8.23
Min
5.12

A P/E Ratio of 16.46 places RZB in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

APO

-0.24

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

APO has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -0.24. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

RZB

1.52

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
1.04
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.20

RZB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.52 is exceptionally high for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

APO

3.35

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
5.92
Q3
5.27
Median
4.62
Q1
3.97
Min
3.32

In the lower quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, APO’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RZB

0.62

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
1.18
Q3
1.07
Median
0.91
Q1
0.83
Min
0.62

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

APO

4.72

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
4.67
Q3
3.65
Median
2.63
Q1
1.61
Min
0.59

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management - Global industry.

RZB

1.15

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
1.18
Median
1.08
Q1
0.93
Min
0.73

RZB’s P/B Ratio of 1.15 is within the conventional range for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APO vs. RZB: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPORZB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)23.6216.46
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-0.241.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.350.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.721.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)23.242.58
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)10.2212.68
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.240.65