APO vs. OWL: Apollo Global Management vs. Blue Owl Capital Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Apollo Global Management (APO) and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but APO is classified in Financial Services while OWL is classified in Capital Markets.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 6.41% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.89% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative net margin of -3.01%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports 3.08%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative operating margin of -44.34%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports 31.15%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 22.73% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 25.04% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at -24.42% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at -50.00% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 9.66% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.87% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, OWL the richer one.

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports payout ratio above 100% at 650.00%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Apollo Global Management (APO) reports 75.00%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Blue Owl Capital (OWL) trades at 70.14 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Apollo Global Management (APO) has no P/E ratio this period.

Apollo Global Management (APO) at 2.26 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 5.04 sits in the pricier quartile — OWL costs more per dollar of sales.

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.54 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 4.32 carries an above-peer premium to book — APO is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics