APO vs. ICE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APO and ICE, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With APO at 74.68 billion USD and ICE at 100.22 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 1.65 for APO and 1.13 for ICE, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | APO | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apollo Global Management, Inc. | Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management - Global | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| CEO | Mr. Marc Jeffrey Rowan | Mr. Jeffrey C. Sprecher |
| Price | 130.68 USD | 174.72 USD |
| Market Cap | 74.68 billion USD | 100.22 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.65 | 1.13 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 30, 2011 | November 16, 2005 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APO and ICE over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APO and ICE based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- APO posts a negative forward PEG of -0.21, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas ICE at 3.14 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
| Symbol | APO | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 21.36 | 36.02 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -0.21 | 3.14 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.03 | 8.32 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.27 | 3.59 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 21.02 | 25.30 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 9.21 | 19.57 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.92 | 9.97 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.25 | 30.31 |
Dividend Comparison
Both APO and ICE offer similar dividend yields (1.45% vs. 1.05%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | APO | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.45% | 1.05% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APO and ICE, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.80 and 1.00, both APO and ICE have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- APO’s quick ratio of 0.80 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ICE at 1.00 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
| Symbol | APO | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.59 | 0.74 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.14 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.30 | 5.12 |