APO vs. FUTU: Apollo Global Management vs. Futu Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Apollo Global Management (APO) and Futu (FUTU) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but APO is classified in Financial Services while FUTU is classified in Capital Markets.

Apollo Global Management (APO) trades as ordinary local shares, while Futu (FUTU) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Apollo Global Management (APO) has an aggressive beta of 1.47, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Futu (FUTU) is defensive at 0.68 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Futu (FUTU) at 30.52% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.89% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in returns on equity.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative net margin of -3.01%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Futu (FUTU) reports 46.20%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative operating margin of -44.34%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Futu (FUTU) reports 66.75%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Futu (FUTU) at 68.11% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Apollo Global Management (APO) at 22.73%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Futu (FUTU) at 106.38% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at -24.42% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Futu (FUTU) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a yield of 1.87%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 75.00% and Futu (FUTU) at 25.80% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Futu (FUTU) trades at 9.73 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Apollo Global Management (APO) has no P/E ratio this period.

Futu (FUTU) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 2.26 prices around its industry’s middle — FUTU costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Futu (FUTU) at 2.75 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 4.32 carries an above-peer premium to book — APO is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics