APO vs. FUTU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APO and FUTU, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
APO dominates in value with a market cap of 74.68 billion USD, eclipsing FUTU’s 15.24 billion USD by roughly 4.90×.
APO’s beta of 1.65 points to much larger expected swings compared to FUTU’s calmer 0.67, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
FUTU is an ADR, letting U.S. buyers tap its non-U.S. business directly, unlike APO, which is purely domestic.
| Symbol | APO | FUTU |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apollo Global Management, Inc. | Futu Holdings Limited |
| Country | US | HK |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management - Global | Financial - Capital Markets |
| CEO | Mr. Marc Jeffrey Rowan | Mr. Hua Li |
| Price | 130.68 USD | 109.49 USD |
| Market Cap | 74.68 billion USD | 15.24 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.65 | 0.67 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 30, 2011 | March 8, 2019 |
| ADR | No | Yes |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APO and FUTU over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APO and FUTU based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- APO posts a negative forward PEG of -0.21, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas FUTU at 1.29 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
| Symbol | APO | FUTU |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 21.36 | 22.06 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -0.21 | 1.29 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.03 | 9.03 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.27 | 4.29 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 21.02 | 0.00 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 9.21 | 17.54 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.92 | 8.79 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.25 | 0.00 |
Dividend Comparison
APO’s dividend yield of 1.45% is about 538% higher than FUTU’s 0.23%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | APO | FUTU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.45% | 0.23% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APO and FUTU, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- APO’s current ratio of 0.80 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while FUTU at 1.19 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- APO’s quick ratio of 0.80 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas FUTU at 1.19 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- APO (at 21.30) covers its interest payments, while FUTU shows “--” for minimal debt service.
| Symbol | APO | FUTU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 1.19 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 1.19 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.59 | 0.31 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.30 | -- |