APO vs. CRBG: Apollo Global Management vs. Corebridge Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Apollo Global Management (APO) and Corebridge Financial (CRBG) are both classified in the Diversified Financial Services sub-industry within the broader Financial Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 20.08% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.89% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative net margin of -3.01%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Corebridge Financial (CRBG) reports 10.76%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative operating margin of -44.34%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Corebridge Financial (CRBG) reports 39.53%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Apollo Global Management (APO) at 22.73% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at -5.07% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at -24.42% and Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at -118.28% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Corebridge Financial (CRBG) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Corebridge Financial (CRBG) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.87% and Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 2.89% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 75.00% and Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 22.20% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Corebridge Financial (CRBG) trades at 7.64 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Apollo Global Management (APO) has no P/E ratio this period.

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 0.73 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 2.26 prices around its industry’s middle — CRBG costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 2.41 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 4.32 carries an above-peer premium to book — APO is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics