APO vs. BRK-B: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APO and BRK-B, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
BRK-B stands out with 1,093.60 billion USD in market value—about 14.64× APO’s market cap of 74.68 billion USD.
APO’s beta of 1.65 points to much larger expected swings compared to BRK-B’s calmer 0.87, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
Symbol | APO | BRK-B |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Apollo Global Management, Inc. | Berkshire Hathaway Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
Industry | Asset Management - Global | Insurance - Diversified |
CEO | Mr. Marc Jeffrey Rowan | Mr. Warren E. Buffett |
Price | 130.68 USD | 507.03 USD |
Market Cap | 74.68 billion USD | 1,093.60 billion USD |
Beta | 1.65 | 0.87 |
Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
IPO Date | March 30, 2011 | May 9, 1996 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APO and BRK-B over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APO and BRK-B based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- APO posts a negative forward PEG of -0.21, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas BRK-B at 2.80 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
Symbol | APO | BRK-B |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 21.36 | 13.52 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -0.21 | 2.80 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.03 | 2.63 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.27 | 1.67 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 21.02 | 90.64 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 9.21 | 10.33 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.92 | 2.83 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.25 | 97.58 |
Dividend Comparison
APO delivers a 1.45% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas BRK-B appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
Symbol | APO | BRK-B |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.45% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APO and BRK-B, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.80 and 0.00, both APO and BRK-B have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both APO (quick ratio 0.80) and BRK-B (quick ratio 0.00) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
Symbol | APO | BRK-B |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 0.00 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 0.00 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.59 | 0.19 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.11 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.30 | 34.37 |