APO vs. BEN: Apollo Global Management vs. Franklin Templeton Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Apollo Global Management (APO) and Franklin Templeton (BEN) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but APO is classified in Financial Services while BEN is classified in Capital Markets.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 10.51% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.89% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative net margin of -3.01%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Franklin Templeton (BEN) reports 11.42%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative operating margin of -44.34%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Franklin Templeton (BEN) reports 14.61%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Only one side can be read here: Apollo Global Management (APO) reports revenue growth of 22.73%, ranked against its industry; Franklin Templeton (BEN) has no revenue growth figure this period.

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 116.48% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at -24.42% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 4.10% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.87% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, BEN the richer one.

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 75.00% and Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 89.12% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Franklin Templeton (BEN) trades at 17.12 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Apollo Global Management (APO) has no P/E ratio this period.

On P/S ratio, both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 2.26 and Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.84 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.46 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 4.32 carries an above-peer premium to book — APO is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics