APO vs. BCS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APO and BCS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With APO at 74.68 billion USD and BCS at 62.70 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
APO’s beta of 1.65 points to much larger expected swings compared to BCS’s calmer 1.05, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
BCS is an ADR, letting U.S. buyers tap its non-U.S. business directly, unlike APO, which is purely domestic.
| Symbol | APO | BCS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apollo Global Management, Inc. | Barclays PLC |
| Country | US | GB |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management - Global | Banks - Diversified |
| CEO | Mr. Marc Jeffrey Rowan | Mr. Coimbatore Sundararajan Venkatakrishnan Ph.D. |
| Price | 130.68 USD | 17.57 USD |
| Market Cap | 74.68 billion USD | 62.70 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.65 | 1.05 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 30, 2011 | September 9, 1986 |
| ADR | No | Yes |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APO and BCS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APO and BCS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- APO posts a negative forward PEG of -0.21, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas BCS at 0.50 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
| Symbol | APO | BCS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 21.36 | 7.38 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -0.21 | 0.50 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.03 | 1.72 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.27 | 0.63 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 21.02 | 0.00 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 9.21 | -20.59 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.92 | -3.06 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.25 | 0.00 |
Dividend Comparison
BCS stands out with a 2.59% dividend yield—around 78% above APO’s 1.45%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | APO | BCS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.45% | 2.59% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APO and BCS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.80 and 0.67, both APO and BCS have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both APO (quick ratio 0.80) and BCS (quick ratio 0.67) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- APO (at 21.30) covers its interest payments, while BCS shows “--” for minimal debt service.
| Symbol | APO | BCS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 0.67 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 0.67 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.59 | 1.48 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.07 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.30 | -- |