APO vs. ARCC: Apollo Global Management vs. Ares Capital Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Apollo Global Management (APO) and Ares Capital (ARCC) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but APO is classified in Financial Services while ARCC is classified in Capital Markets.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Apollo Global Management (APO) has an aggressive beta of 1.47, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Ares Capital (ARCC) is defensive at 0.59 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Ares Capital (ARCC) at 6.19% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.89% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative net margin of -3.01%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Ares Capital (ARCC) reports 28.35%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative operating margin of -44.34%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Ares Capital (ARCC) reports 72.74%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Apollo Global Management (APO) at 22.73% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Ares Capital (ARCC) at -12.08% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Ares Capital (ARCC) at -23.77% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at -24.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Ares Capital (ARCC) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Ares Capital (ARCC) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.87% pays an industry-typical yield; Ares Capital (ARCC) at 9.92% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Ares Capital (ARCC) reports payout ratio above 100% at 157.38%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Apollo Global Management (APO) reports 75.00%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Ares Capital (ARCC) trades at 15.68 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Apollo Global Management (APO) has no P/E ratio this period.

On P/S ratio, both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 2.26 and Ares Capital (ARCC) at 4.48 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Ares Capital (ARCC) at 0.99 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 4.32 carries an above-peer premium to book — APO is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics