Seek Returns logo

APH vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APH and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

UBER’s market capitalization of 195.80 billion USD is significantly greater than APH’s 120.31 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.13 for APH and 1.39 for UBER, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAPHUBER
Company NameAmphenol CorporationUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsSoftware - Application
CEORichard Adam NorwittDara Khosrowshahi
Price99.46 USD93.63 USD
Market Cap120.31 billion USD195.80 billion USD
Beta1.131.39
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 8, 1991May 10, 2019
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APH and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APH vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

APH

27.13%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Equity of 27.13% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UBER

69.55%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 69.55% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software - Application industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

APH

15.20%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.20% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

UBER

18.41%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

In the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, UBER’s Return on Invested Capital of 18.41% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

APH

15.58%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.58% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

27.07%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

A Net Profit Margin of 27.07% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

APH

21.26%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.26% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UBER

8.49%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.49% is around the midpoint for the Software - Application industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPHUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)27.13%69.55%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.41%23.26%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)15.20%18.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.58%27.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.26%8.49%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.94%39.58%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

APH

1.99

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

APH’s Current Ratio of 1.99 aligns with the median group of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.02

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.02 falls into the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

APH

0.70

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

APH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UBER

0.51

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 is typical for the Software - Application industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

APH

13.97

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

APH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

7.65

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

UBER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.65 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software - Application industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPHUBER
Current Ratio (TTM)1.991.02
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.361.02
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.700.51
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.310.21
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.290.81
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.977.65

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for APH and UBER. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

APH

0.66%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.66%, APH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UBER

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

APH

25.37%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.37% is within the typical range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPHUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.37%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

APH

46.05

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

APH’s P/E Ratio of 46.05 is within the middle range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

15.95

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

In the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry, UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.95 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

APH

4.55

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

UBER

0.73

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

UBER’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.73 is within the middle range of its peers in the Software - Application industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

APH

7.17

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

APH’s P/S Ratio of 7.17 is in the upper echelon for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.31

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 4.31 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

APH

11.68

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

At 11.68, APH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UBER

8.92

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

APH vs. UBER: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPHUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)46.0515.95
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.550.73
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.174.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)11.688.92
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)54.1125.15
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)29.5327.40
EV-to-Sales (TTM)7.504.45