Seek Returns logo

APH vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at APH and QBTS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

APH dwarfs QBTS in market cap, clocking in at 103.65 billion USD—about 23.38 times the 4.43 billion USD of its counterpart.

APH at 1.10 and QBTS at 0.89 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.

SymbolAPHQBTS
Company NameAmphenol CorporationD-Wave Quantum Inc.
CountryUSCA
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsComputer Hardware
CEOMr. Richard Adam Norwitt J.D.Dr. Alan E. Baratz Ph.D.
Price85.69 USD15.36 USD
Market Cap103.65 billion USD4.43 billion USD
Beta1.1030.886
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 8, 1991December 11, 2020
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of APH and QBTS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APH and QBTS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

  • QBTS shows a negative P/E of -33.33, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, APH at 39.67 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
  • QBTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -84.98, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, APH at 46.62 maintains a positive cash position.
SymbolAPHQBTS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)39.67-33.33
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.241.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)6.18207.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)10.0621.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)46.62-84.98
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)25.62-30.97
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.51193.69
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)49.10-79.30

Dividend Comparison

APH’s 0.71% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike QBTS, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits APH’s balanced approach against QBTS’s long-term focus.

SymbolAPHQBTS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.71%0.00%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of APH and QBTS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • QBTS’s -28.05 sits under 1.5, where earnings hug interest costs too closely—a squeeze if income dips. Meanwhile, APH at 13.97 has room to breathe.
SymbolAPHQBTS
Current Ratio (TTM)1.9920.73
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.3620.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.700.04
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.310.02
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.97-28.05