APH vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APH and QBTS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
APH dwarfs QBTS in market cap, clocking in at 103.65 billion USD—about 23.38 times the 4.43 billion USD of its counterpart.
APH at 1.10 and QBTS at 0.89 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Symbol | APH | QBTS |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Amphenol Corporation | D-Wave Quantum Inc. |
Country | US | CA |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Computer Hardware |
CEO | Mr. Richard Adam Norwitt J.D. | Dr. Alan E. Baratz Ph.D. |
Price | 85.69 USD | 15.36 USD |
Market Cap | 103.65 billion USD | 4.43 billion USD |
Beta | 1.103 | 0.886 |
Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
IPO Date | November 8, 1991 | December 11, 2020 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APH and QBTS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APH and QBTS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- QBTS shows a negative P/E of -33.33, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, APH at 39.67 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
- QBTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -84.98, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, APH at 46.62 maintains a positive cash position.
Symbol | APH | QBTS |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 39.67 | -33.33 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.24 | 1.25 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.18 | 207.56 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 10.06 | 21.21 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 46.62 | -84.98 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 25.62 | -30.97 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.51 | 193.69 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.10 | -79.30 |
Dividend Comparison
APH’s 0.71% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike QBTS, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits APH’s balanced approach against QBTS’s long-term focus.
Symbol | APH | QBTS |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.71% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APH and QBTS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- QBTS’s -28.05 sits under 1.5, where earnings hug interest costs too closely—a squeeze if income dips. Meanwhile, APH at 13.97 has room to breathe.
Symbol | APH | QBTS |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.99 | 20.73 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.36 | 20.61 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.70 | 0.04 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.31 | 0.02 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 13.97 | -28.05 |