Seek Returns logo

APH vs. NTAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APH and NTAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPHNTAP
Company NameAmphenol CorporationNetApp, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization164.24 billion USD21.60 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 8, 1991November 21, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APH and NTAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APH vs. NTAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPHNTAP
5-Day Price Return-7.03%-2.72%
13-Week Price Return22.46%0.60%
26-Week Price Return55.91%9.96%
52-Week Price Return84.90%-8.56%
Month-to-Date Return-4.02%-7.08%
Year-to-Date Return92.57%-5.72%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.59M1.85M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.54M1.88M
3-Month Volatility29.66%28.14%
Beta1.221.38

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APH

34.63%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.62%
Q3
13.32%
Median
9.23%
Q1
4.70%
Min
-3.60%

APH’s Return on Equity of 34.63% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

NTAP

120.04%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
56.93%
Q3
29.31%
Median
7.95%
Q1
5.02%
Min
-7.45%

NTAP’s Return on Equity of 120.04% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

APH vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APH

18.22%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
18.22%
Q3
10.34%
Median
7.81%
Q1
3.28%
Min
-4.57%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.22% places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NTAP

17.77%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.92%
Q3
8.33%
Median
4.15%
Q1
1.88%
Min
-3.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.77% places NTAP in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

APH vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APH

24.31%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
26.64%
Q3
15.10%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-7.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 24.31% places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NTAP

20.70%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
20.70%
Q3
10.85%
Median
6.05%
Q1
3.54%
Min
-4.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.70% places NTAP in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

APH vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPHNTAP
Return on Equity (TTM)34.63%120.04%
Return on Assets (TTM)15.73%12.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.22%17.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)24.31%20.70%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.31%70.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APH

2.07

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.52
Q3
3.20
Median
2.02
Q1
1.51
Min
0.33

APH’s Current Ratio of 2.07 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NTAP

1.31

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.90
Median
1.38
Q1
0.97
Min
0.11

NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APH vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APH

0.64

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.55
Median
0.33
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

APH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NTAP

2.55

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.82
Median
0.42
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.55, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

APH vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APH

14.88

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
114.40
Q3
51.32
Median
14.03
Q1
3.74
Min
-61.15

APH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.88 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NTAP

17.59

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
143.63
Q3
62.44
Median
17.59
Q1
5.32
Min
-23.93

NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APH vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPHNTAP
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.071.31
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.411.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.642.55
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.8817.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

APH vs. NTAP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APH vs. NTAP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APH

0.49%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.16%
Q3
2.39%
Median
1.18%
Q1
0.12%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Yield of 0.49% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NTAP

1.93%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.93%
Q3
3.31%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.01%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.93% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

APH vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APH

20.92%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
197.57%
Q3
87.33%
Median
36.23%
Q1
3.99%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.92% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NTAP

35.95%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
136.56%
Q3
76.58%
Median
35.95%
Q1
0.01%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.95% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APH vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPHNTAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.49%1.93%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.92%35.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APH

42.84

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
71.05
Q3
42.87
Median
27.84
Q1
19.17
Min
7.73

APH’s P/E Ratio of 42.84 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTAP

18.66

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.58
Q3
27.14
Median
21.23
Q1
15.28
Min
8.31

NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 18.66 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APH vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APH

7.81

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.81
Q3
4.01
Median
2.09
Q1
1.25
Min
0.16

APH’s P/S Ratio of 7.81 is in the upper echelon for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NTAP

3.32

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
6.35
Q3
3.45
Median
0.96
Q1
0.46
Min
0.04

NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APH vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APH

12.07

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
4.09
Median
2.35
Q1
1.55
Min
0.44

At 12.07, APH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NTAP

21.54

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.94
Q3
8.15
Median
1.85
Q1
0.94
Min
0.32

At 21.54, NTAP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

APH vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPHNTAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)42.8418.66
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.813.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.0721.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)46.0213.18
APH vs. NTAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison