Seek Returns logo

APH vs. MSFT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APH and MSFT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPHMSFT
Company NameAmphenol CorporationMicrosoft Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsSoftware
Market Capitalization133.97 billion USD3,748.25 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 8, 1991March 13, 1986
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APH and MSFT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APH vs. MSFT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPHMSFT
5-Day Price Return-0.23%-1.08%
13-Week Price Return28.70%10.86%
26-Week Price Return57.18%21.58%
52-Week Price Return64.36%21.35%
Month-to-Date Return3.02%-5.48%
Year-to-Date Return58.00%19.63%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.15M22.11M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.38M20.62M
3-Month Volatility20.23%15.65%
Beta1.181.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APH

30.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

APH’s Return on Equity of 30.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MSFT

32.44%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, MSFT’s Return on Equity of 32.44% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

APH vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APH

16.90%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.90% places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MSFT

36.15%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 36.15% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

APH vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APH

22.41%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.41% places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MSFT

45.29%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 45.29% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

APH vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPHMSFT
Return on Equity (TTM)30.97%32.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.20%18.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.90%36.15%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.41%45.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.73%68.82%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APH

2.02

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

APH’s Current Ratio of 2.02 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MSFT

1.35

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

MSFT’s Current Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APH vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APH

0.70

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

APH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MSFT

0.26

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

MSFT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.26 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APH vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APH

14.88

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

APH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.88 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MSFT

891.80

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 891.80, MSFT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

APH vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPHMSFT
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.021.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.341.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.700.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.88891.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

APH vs. MSFT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APH vs. MSFT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APH

0.55%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Yield of 0.55% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MSFT

0.64%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSFT’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

APH vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APH

22.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.97% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MSFT

23.65%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 23.65%, MSFT’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

APH vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPHMSFT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.55%0.64%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.97%23.65%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APH

41.68

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

A P/E Ratio of 41.68 places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MSFT

37.23

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

MSFT’s P/E Ratio of 37.23 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APH vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APH

7.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 7.04, APH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MSFT

13.46

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

MSFT’s P/S Ratio of 13.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APH vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APH

10.37

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 10.37, APH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MSFT

10.76

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

MSFT’s P/B Ratio of 10.76 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APH vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPHMSFT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)41.6837.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.0413.46
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.3710.76
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)47.0552.94