Seek Returns logo

APH vs. LFUS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APH and LFUS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPHLFUS
Company NameAmphenol CorporationLittelfuse, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization132.65 billion USD6.18 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 8, 1991September 22, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APH and LFUS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APH vs. LFUS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPHLFUS
5-Day Price Return-1.89%-2.77%
13-Week Price Return25.74%15.09%
26-Week Price Return56.62%0.65%
52-Week Price Return63.75%-5.21%
Month-to-Date Return2.01%-3.14%
Year-to-Date Return56.44%5.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.83M0.14M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.39M0.21M
3-Month Volatility20.44%35.21%
Beta1.181.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APH

30.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

APH’s Return on Equity of 30.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LFUS

4.27%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

LFUS’s Return on Equity of 4.27% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

APH vs. LFUS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APH

16.90%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.90% places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LFUS

4.73%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

LFUS’s Net Profit Margin of 4.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APH vs. LFUS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APH

22.41%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.41% places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LFUS

8.89%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

LFUS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.89% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APH vs. LFUS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPHLFUS
Return on Equity (TTM)30.97%4.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.20%2.70%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.90%4.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.41%8.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.73%36.74%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APH

2.02

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

APH’s Current Ratio of 2.02 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LFUS

4.06

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

LFUS’s Current Ratio of 4.06 is in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

APH vs. LFUS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APH

0.70

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

APH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LFUS

0.31

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

LFUS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APH vs. LFUS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APH

14.88

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

APH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.88 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LFUS

6.15

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

LFUS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.15 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APH vs. LFUS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPHLFUS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.024.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.342.76
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.700.31
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.886.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

APH vs. LFUS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APH vs. LFUS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APH

0.55%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Yield of 0.55% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LFUS

1.13%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

LFUS’s Dividend Yield of 1.13% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

APH vs. LFUS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APH

22.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.97% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LFUS

32.73%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

LFUS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.73% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APH vs. LFUS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPHLFUS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.55%1.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.97%32.73%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APH

41.68

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

A P/E Ratio of 41.68 places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LFUS

57.36

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

A P/E Ratio of 57.36 places LFUS in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

APH vs. LFUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APH

7.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 7.04, APH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LFUS

2.71

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

LFUS’s P/S Ratio of 2.71 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APH vs. LFUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APH

10.37

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 10.37, APH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LFUS

2.16

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

LFUS’s P/B Ratio of 2.16 is within the conventional range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APH vs. LFUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPHLFUS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)41.6857.36
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.042.71
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.372.16
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)47.0519.51