Seek Returns logo

APH vs. LDOS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APH and LDOS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPHLDOS
Company NameAmphenol CorporationLeidos Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsProfessional Services
Market Capitalization134.46 billion USD23.53 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 8, 1991October 17, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APH and LDOS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APH vs. LDOS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPHLDOS
5-Day Price Return1.21%1.63%
13-Week Price Return24.68%20.22%
26-Week Price Return62.96%44.61%
52-Week Price Return65.21%18.42%
Month-to-Date Return3.40%14.87%
Year-to-Date Return58.57%27.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.93M0.67M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.42M1.09M
3-Month Volatility20.16%23.30%
Beta1.180.73

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APH

30.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

APH’s Return on Equity of 30.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LDOS

31.25%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

In the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, LDOS’s Return on Equity of 31.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

APH vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APH

16.90%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.90% places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LDOS

8.22%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

LDOS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.22% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APH vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APH

22.41%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.41% places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LDOS

11.95%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

LDOS’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.95% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APH vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPHLDOS
Return on Equity (TTM)30.97%31.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.20%10.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.90%8.22%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.41%11.95%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.73%17.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APH

2.02

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

APH’s Current Ratio of 2.02 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LDOS

1.62

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

LDOS’s Current Ratio of 1.62 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APH vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APH

0.70

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

APH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LDOS

1.09

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

LDOS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.09 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APH vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APH

14.88

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

APH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.88 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LDOS

11.64

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

LDOS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APH vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPHLDOS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.021.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.341.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.701.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.8811.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

APH vs. LDOS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APH vs. LDOS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APH

0.55%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Yield of 0.55% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LDOS

0.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Yield of 0.91% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

APH vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APH

22.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.97% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LDOS

14.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.91% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

APH vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPHLDOS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.55%0.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.97%14.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APH

41.68

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

A P/E Ratio of 41.68 places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LDOS

16.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, LDOS’s P/E Ratio of 16.43 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

APH vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APH

7.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 7.04, APH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LDOS

1.35

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

LDOS’s P/S Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APH vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APH

10.37

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 10.37, APH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LDOS

4.54

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

LDOS’s P/B Ratio of 4.54 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APH vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPHLDOS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)41.6816.43
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.041.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.374.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)47.0517.20