Seek Returns logo

APH vs. JKHY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APH and JKHY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPHJKHY
Company NameAmphenol CorporationJack Henry & Associates, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsFinancial Services
Market Capitalization132.65 billion USD11.93 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 8, 1991November 20, 1985
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APH and JKHY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APH vs. JKHY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPHJKHY
5-Day Price Return-1.89%2.86%
13-Week Price Return25.74%-11.12%
26-Week Price Return56.62%-3.91%
52-Week Price Return63.75%-0.18%
Month-to-Date Return2.01%-3.54%
Year-to-Date Return56.44%-6.56%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.83M1.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.39M0.62M
3-Month Volatility20.44%18.97%
Beta1.180.80

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APH

30.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

APH’s Return on Equity of 30.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

JKHY

22.07%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, JKHY’s Return on Equity of 22.07% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

APH vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APH

16.90%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.90% places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JKHY

19.19%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

JKHY’s Net Profit Margin of 19.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APH vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APH

22.41%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.41% places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JKHY

23.94%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

JKHY’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.94% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APH vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPHJKHY
Return on Equity (TTM)30.97%22.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.20%14.68%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.90%19.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.41%23.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.73%42.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APH

2.02

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

APH’s Current Ratio of 2.02 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JKHY

1.36

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

APH vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APH

0.70

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

APH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

JKHY

0.08

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

APH vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APH

14.88

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

APH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.88 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JKHY

78.80

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

APH vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPHJKHY
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.021.36
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.341.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.700.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.8878.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

APH vs. JKHY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APH vs. JKHY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APH

0.55%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Yield of 0.55% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

JKHY

1.35%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JKHY’s Dividend Yield of 1.35% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

APH vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APH

22.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.97% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

JKHY

37.87%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JKHY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 37.87% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APH vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPHJKHY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.55%1.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.97%37.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APH

41.68

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

A P/E Ratio of 41.68 places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

JKHY

26.34

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

JKHY’s P/E Ratio of 26.34 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APH vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APH

7.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 7.04, APH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

JKHY

5.05

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

APH vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APH

10.37

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 10.37, APH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

JKHY

6.54

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

JKHY’s P/B Ratio of 6.54 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

APH vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPHJKHY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)41.6826.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.045.05
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.376.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)47.0539.66