Seek Returns logo

APH vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APH and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

APH’s market capitalization of 120.31 billion USD is substantially larger than JBL’s 24.26 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.13 for APH and 1.14 for JBL, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAPHJBL
Company NameAmphenol CorporationJabil Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsHardware, Equipment & Parts
CEORichard Adam NorwittMichael Dastoor
Price99.46 USD226.01 USD
Market Cap120.31 billion USD24.26 billion USD
Beta1.131.14
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 8, 1991May 3, 1993
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APH and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APH vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

APH

27.13%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Equity of 27.13% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

JBL

38.64%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their ROE against the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

APH

15.20%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.20% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

JBL

15.00%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, JBL’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.00% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their ROIC against the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

APH

15.58%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.58% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JBL

2.02%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

APH

21.26%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.26% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JBL

4.08%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPHJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)27.13%38.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.41%3.10%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)15.20%15.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.58%2.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.26%4.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.94%8.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

APH

1.99

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

APH’s Current Ratio of 1.99 aligns with the median group of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JBL

0.98

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

APH

0.70

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

APH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

JBL

2.59

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.59, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

APH

13.97

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

APH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JBL

28.37

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 28.37 is in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPHJBL
Current Ratio (TTM)1.990.98
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.360.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.702.59
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.310.18
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.291.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.9728.37

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for APH and JBL. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

APH

0.66%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.66%, APH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

JBL

0.14%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.14% is consistent with its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

APH

25.37%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.37% is within the typical range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

JBL

6.59%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPHJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%0.14%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.37%6.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

APH

46.05

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

APH’s P/E Ratio of 46.05 is within the middle range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JBL

43.17

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 43.17 is within the middle range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

APH

4.55

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

JBL

2.77

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

APH

7.17

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

APH’s P/S Ratio of 7.17 is in the upper echelon for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

JBL

0.85

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

In the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.85 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

APH

11.68

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

At 11.68, APH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

JBL

19.38

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

At 19.38, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

APH vs. JBL: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPHJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)46.0543.17
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.552.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.170.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)11.6819.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)54.1119.41
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)29.5324.92
EV-to-Sales (TTM)7.500.91