APH vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APH and FTV, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
APH dominates in value with a market cap of 103.65 billion USD, eclipsing FTV’s 23.83 billion USD by roughly 4.35×.
With betas of 1.10 for APH and 1.16 for FTV, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | APH | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Amphenol Corporation | Fortive Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| CEO | Mr. Richard Adam Norwitt J.D. | Mr. James A. Lico |
| Price | 85.69 USD | 70.1 USD |
| Market Cap | 103.65 billion USD | 23.83 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.10 | 1.16 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | November 8, 1991 | July 5, 2016 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APH and FTV over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between APH and FTV, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | APH | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 39.67 | 29.99 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.24 | 2.51 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.18 | 3.85 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 10.06 | 2.34 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 46.62 | 17.13 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 25.62 | 17.63 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.51 | 4.33 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.10 | 19.26 |
Dividend Comparison
APH’s dividend yield of 0.71% is about 55% higher than FTV’s 0.46%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | APH | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.71% | 0.46% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APH and FTV, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- FTV’s current ratio of 0.99 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas APH at 1.99 maintains healthy liquidity.
- FTV posts a quick ratio of 0.78, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while APH at 1.36 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
| Symbol | APH | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.99 | 0.99 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.36 | 0.78 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.70 | 0.38 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.31 | 0.23 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 13.97 | 10.46 |