APH vs. CRM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APH and CRM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
CRM towers over APH with a market cap of 270.84 billion USD, roughly 2.61 times the 103.65 billion USD of its peer.
APH at 1.10 and CRM at 1.42 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
| Symbol | APH | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Amphenol Corporation | Salesforce, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Richard Adam Norwitt J.D. | Mr. Marc R. Benioff |
| Price | 85.69 USD | 282.28 USD |
| Market Cap | 103.65 billion USD | 270.84 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.103 | 1.421 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | November 8, 1991 | June 23, 2004 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APH and CRM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between APH and CRM, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | APH | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 39.67 | 43.68 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.24 | 3.85 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.18 | 7.15 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 10.06 | 4.43 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 46.62 | 21.78 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 25.62 | 33.74 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.51 | 7.21 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.10 | 21.99 |
Dividend Comparison
Both APH at 0.71% and CRM at 0.57% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Their yields align closely, indicating similar income-growth balances.
| Symbol | APH | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.71% | 0.57% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APH and CRM, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- CRM’s interest coverage comes up “--”, reflecting interest demands so faint they’re barely there—likely minimal debt or tiny rates—whereas APH at 0.00 cruises past interest with ease.
| Symbol | APH | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.99 | 1.06 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.36 | 1.06 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.70 | 0.19 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.31 | 0.11 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 13.97 | -- |