APH vs. AUR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APH and AUR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
APH dominates in value with a market cap of 103.65 billion USD, eclipsing AUR’s 10.72 billion USD by roughly 9.67×.
AUR carries a higher beta at 2.77, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while APH remains steadier at 1.10.
| Symbol | APH | AUR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Amphenol Corporation | Aurora Innovation, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Information Technology Services |
| CEO | Mr. Richard Adam Norwitt J.D. | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. |
| Price | 85.69 USD | 6.06 USD |
| Market Cap | 103.65 billion USD | 10.72 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.10 | 2.77 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | November 8, 1991 | May 10, 2021 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APH and AUR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APH and AUR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AUR shows a negative P/E of -13.36, highlighting a year of losses, whereas APH at 39.67 trades on solid profitability.
- AUR reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -16.83, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while APH at 46.62 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | APH | AUR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 39.67 | -13.36 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.24 | 0.51 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.18 | 0.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 10.06 | 5.92 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 46.62 | -16.83 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 25.62 | -13.53 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.51 | 0.00 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.10 | -16.74 |
Dividend Comparison
APH delivers a 0.71% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas AUR appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | APH | AUR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.71% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APH and AUR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- APH (at 13.97) covers its interest payments, while AUR shows “--” for minimal debt service.
| Symbol | APH | AUR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.99 | 9.54 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.36 | 9.54 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.70 | 0.06 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.31 | 0.06 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 13.97 | -- |