Seek Returns logo

APG vs. ZTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APG and ZTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ZTO’s market capitalization of 14.52 billion USD is significantly greater than APG’s 9.50 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

APG has a positive beta (1.58), indicating it generally moves with the broader market, whereas ZTO has a negative beta (-0.17), often moving inversely, which can offer diversification or hedging benefits.

ZTO is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. APG, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAPGZTO
Company NameAPi Group CorporationZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
CountryUSCN
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionIntegrated Freight & Logistics
CEORussell A. BeckerMeisong Lai
Price34.33 USD18.05 USD
Market Cap9.50 billion USD14.52 billion USD
Beta1.58-0.17
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateApril 29, 2020October 27, 2016
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APG and ZTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APG vs. ZTO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

APG

8.18%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

APG’s Return on Equity of 8.18% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ZTO

15.30%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
37.37%
Q3
30.76%
Median
15.30%
Q1
6.33%
Min
-26.64%

ZTO’s Return on Equity of 15.30% is on par with the norm for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

APG

5.74%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

APG’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.74% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ZTO

11.37%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
17.03%
Q3
12.11%
Median
8.38%
Q1
2.55%
Min
0.79%

ZTO’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.37% is in line with the norm for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

APG

3.36%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

APG’s Net Profit Margin of 3.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ZTO

20.76%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
7.64%
Q3
4.86%
Median
3.72%
Q1
0.61%
Min
0.61%

ZTO’s Net Profit Margin of 20.76% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

APG

6.66%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

APG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.66% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ZTO

26.35%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
11.80%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.93%
Q1
3.63%
Min
0.83%

ZTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPGZTO
Return on Equity (TTM)8.18%15.30%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.96%10.07%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)5.74%11.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.36%20.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.66%26.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.45%29.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

APG

1.47

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

APG’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZTO

1.05

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.36
Median
1.13
Q1
1.02
Min
0.78

ZTO’s Current Ratio of 1.05 aligns with the median group of the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

APG

1.02

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

APG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Engineering & Construction industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.02. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ZTO

0.27

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.69
Median
0.45
Q1
0.24
Min
0.16

ZTO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

APG

3.17

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

In the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, APG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.17 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ZTO

36.90

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
19.14
Q3
12.59
Median
6.24
Q1
1.76
Min
0.11

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.90, ZTO demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPGZTO
Current Ratio (TTM)1.471.05
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.381.05
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.020.27
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.380.18
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)3.300.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.1736.90

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for APG and ZTO. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

APG

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZTO

3.87%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.46%
Q3
2.50%
Median
1.47%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.87%, ZTO offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

APG

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZTO

38.37%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
92.20%
Q3
43.42%
Median
30.12%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZTO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.37% is within the typical range for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPGZTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.87%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%38.37%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

APG

39.62

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

APG’s P/E Ratio of 39.62 is within the middle range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ZTO

10.91

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
38.34
Q3
27.03
Median
21.39
Q1
15.71
Min
10.86

In the lower quartile for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, ZTO’s P/E Ratio of 10.91 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

APG

3.35

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

ZTO

0.89

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.72
Median
1.10
Q1
0.87
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry.

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

APG

1.33

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

APG’s P/S Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ZTO

2.23

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.22
Q3
1.42
Median
0.94
Q1
0.62
Min
0.30

With a P/S Ratio of 2.23, ZTO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

APG

3.19

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

APG’s P/B Ratio of 3.19 is within the conventional range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ZTO

1.64

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
9.09
Q3
5.80
Median
3.47
Q1
1.54
Min
0.57

ZTO’s P/B Ratio of 1.64 is within the conventional range for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APG vs. ZTO: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPGZTO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)39.6210.91
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.350.89
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.332.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.191.64
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)15.8111.05
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)15.478.39
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.692.33