Seek Returns logo

APG vs. WAB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APG and WAB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

WAB’s market capitalization of 36.68 billion USD is significantly greater than APG’s 9.50 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.58 for APG and 1.13 for WAB, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAPGWAB
Company NameAPi Group CorporationWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionRailroads
CEORussell A. BeckerRafael Ottoni Santana
Price34.33 USD214.37 USD
Market Cap9.50 billion USD36.68 billion USD
Beta1.581.13
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateApril 29, 2020June 16, 1995
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APG and WAB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APG vs. WAB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

APG

8.18%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

APG’s Return on Equity of 8.18% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WAB

10.73%

Railroads Industry

Max
40.80%
Q3
24.36%
Median
18.32%
Q1
11.84%
Min
8.37%

WAB’s Return on Equity of 10.73% is in the lower quartile for the Railroads industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Engineering & Construction and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

APG

5.74%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

APG’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.74% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

WAB

8.17%

Railroads Industry

Max
11.47%
Q3
9.66%
Median
9.08%
Q1
7.36%
Min
4.32%

WAB’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.17% is in line with the norm for the Railroads industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Engineering & Construction and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

APG

3.36%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

APG’s Net Profit Margin of 3.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

WAB

10.53%

Railroads Industry

Max
27.77%
Q3
26.50%
Median
24.33%
Q1
9.34%
Min
4.79%

WAB’s Net Profit Margin of 10.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Railroads industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

APG

6.66%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

APG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.66% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WAB

16.09%

Railroads Industry

Max
41.08%
Q3
37.86%
Median
35.40%
Q1
15.99%
Min
10.85%

WAB’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.09% is around the midpoint for the Railroads industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPGWAB
Return on Equity (TTM)8.18%10.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.96%5.79%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)5.74%8.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.36%10.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.66%16.09%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.45%31.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

APG

1.47

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

APG’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WAB

1.34

Railroads Industry

Max
1.97
Q3
1.41
Median
0.85
Q1
0.77
Min
0.62

WAB’s Current Ratio of 1.34 aligns with the median group of the Railroads industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

APG

1.02

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

APG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Engineering & Construction industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.02. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

WAB

0.39

Railroads Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.44
Median
1.19
Q1
0.72
Min
0.39

Falling into the lower quartile for the Railroads industry, WAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

APG

3.17

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

In the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, APG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.17 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

WAB

8.45

Railroads Industry

Max
8.45
Q3
7.16
Median
6.40
Q1
5.53
Min
4.30

WAB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.45 is in the upper quartile for the Railroads industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Engineering & Construction and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPGWAB
Current Ratio (TTM)1.471.34
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.380.73
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.020.39
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.380.21
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)3.301.64
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.178.45

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for APG and WAB. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

APG

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

WAB

0.42%

Railroads Industry

Max
4.30%
Q3
2.64%
Median
2.21%
Q1
1.33%
Min
0.43%

WAB’s Dividend Yield of 0.42% is below the typical range for the Railroads industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Engineering & Construction and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

APG

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

WAB

13.29%

Railroads Industry

Max
69.30%
Q3
47.83%
Median
32.93%
Q1
18.85%
Min
13.29%

WAB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.29% is in the lower quartile for the Railroads industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPGWAB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%13.29%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

APG

39.62

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

APG’s P/E Ratio of 39.62 is within the middle range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WAB

33.05

Railroads Industry

Max
26.01
Q3
22.00
Median
19.48
Q1
17.09
Min
16.09

At 33.05, WAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Railroads industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

APG

3.35

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

WAB

3.48

Railroads Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
1.84
Median
1.79
Q1
1.59
Min
1.52

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Railroads industry.

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

APG

1.33

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

APG’s P/S Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WAB

3.49

Railroads Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
5.30
Median
4.55
Q1
2.73
Min
0.42

WAB’s P/S Ratio of 3.49 aligns with the market consensus for the Railroads industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

APG

3.19

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

APG’s P/B Ratio of 3.19 is within the conventional range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

WAB

3.53

Railroads Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.36
Median
3.70
Q1
1.98
Min
1.00

WAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.53 is within the conventional range for the Railroads industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APG vs. WAB: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPGWAB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)39.6233.05
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.353.48
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.333.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.193.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)15.8124.94
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)15.4719.80
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.693.81