Seek Returns logo

APG vs. ULS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APG and ULS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPGULS
Company NameAPi Group CorporationUL Solutions Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringProfessional Services
Market Capitalization14.39 billion USD14.51 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 29, 2020April 12, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APG and ULS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APG vs. ULS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPGULS
5-Day Price Return0.90%2.91%
13-Week Price Return0.79%2.16%
26-Week Price Return45.13%28.03%
52-Week Price Return59.82%46.68%
Month-to-Date Return0.67%1.91%
Year-to-Date Return44.29%44.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.86M0.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.42M0.79M
3-Month Volatility20.24%35.23%
Beta1.740.43

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APG

8.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

APG’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

ULS

34.07%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

ULS’s Return on Equity of 34.07% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APG

3.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

APG’s Net Profit Margin of 3.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ULS

11.08%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

ULS’s Net Profit Margin of 11.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APG

6.54%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

APG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.54% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ULS

16.71%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

ULS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.71% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPGULS
Return on Equity (TTM)8.22%34.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.00%11.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.35%11.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.54%16.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.08%48.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APG

1.45

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

APG’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ULS

1.32

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

ULS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APG

0.96

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

APG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.96 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ULS

0.56

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

ULS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APG

3.16

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, APG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ULS

11.92

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

ULS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPGULS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.451.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.291.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.960.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.1611.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

APG vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APG vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

APG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ULS

0.70%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Yield of 0.70% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

APG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

APG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ULS

31.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.19% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPGULS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.70%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%31.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APG

58.53

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

At 58.53, APG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ULS

44.36

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

A P/E Ratio of 44.36 places ULS in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

APG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APG

1.96

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

APG’s P/S Ratio of 1.96 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ULS

4.92

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

ULS’s P/S Ratio of 4.92 is in the upper echelon for the Professional Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

APG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APG

4.46

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

APG’s P/B Ratio of 4.46 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ULS

13.37

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

ULS’s P/B Ratio of 13.37 is in the upper tier for the Professional Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

APG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPGULS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)58.5344.36
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.964.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.4613.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.5139.85