Seek Returns logo

APG vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APG and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

PWR’s market capitalization of 57.28 billion USD is significantly greater than APG’s 9.50 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.58 for APG and 1.07 for PWR, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAPGPWR
Company NameAPi Group CorporationQuanta Services, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionEngineering & Construction
CEORussell A. BeckerEarl C. Austin Jr.
Price34.33 USD386.51 USD
Market Cap9.50 billion USD57.28 billion USD
Beta1.581.07
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateApril 29, 2020February 12, 1998
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APG and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APG vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

APG

8.18%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

APG’s Return on Equity of 8.18% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PWR

13.10%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.10% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their ROE against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

APG

5.74%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

APG’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.74% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

PWR

8.15%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

PWR’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.15% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their ROIC against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

APG

3.36%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

APG’s Net Profit Margin of 3.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PWR

3.74%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

APG

6.66%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

APG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.66% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PWR

5.76%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.76% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPGPWR
Return on Equity (TTM)8.18%13.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.96%4.86%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)5.74%8.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.36%3.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.66%5.76%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.45%14.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

APG

1.47

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

APG’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PWR

1.31

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

APG

1.02

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

APG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Engineering & Construction industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.02. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PWR

0.64

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64 is typical for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

APG

3.17

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

In the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, APG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.17 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

PWR

6.63

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.63 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPGPWR
Current Ratio (TTM)1.471.31
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.381.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.020.64
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.380.25
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)3.301.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.176.63

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for APG and PWR. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

APG

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PWR

0.10%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is consistent with its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

APG

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PWR

6.01%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.01% is within the typical range for the Engineering & Construction industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPGPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%6.01%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

APG

39.62

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

APG’s P/E Ratio of 39.62 is within the middle range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PWR

61.58

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

A P/E Ratio of 61.58 places PWR in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

APG

3.35

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

PWR

3.43

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

APG

1.33

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

APG’s P/S Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PWR

2.30

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.30 is in the upper echelon for the Engineering & Construction industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

APG

3.19

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

APG’s P/B Ratio of 3.19 is within the conventional range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PWR

7.69

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

PWR’s P/B Ratio of 7.69 is in the upper tier for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

APG vs. PWR: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPGPWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)39.6261.58
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.353.43
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.332.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.197.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)15.8139.98
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)15.4727.45
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.692.47