Seek Returns logo

APG vs. MTZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APG and MTZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

APG’s market capitalization stands at 9.50 billion USD, while MTZ’s is 13.56 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 1.58 for APG and 1.75 for MTZ, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAPGMTZ
Company NameAPi Group CorporationMasTec, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionEngineering & Construction
CEORussell A. BeckerJose Ramon Mas
Price34.33 USD171.89 USD
Market Cap9.50 billion USD13.56 billion USD
Beta1.581.75
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateApril 29, 2020February 21, 1973
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APG and MTZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APG vs. MTZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

APG

8.18%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

APG’s Return on Equity of 8.18% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MTZ

7.56%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 7.56% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their ROE against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

APG

5.74%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

APG’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.74% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

MTZ

7.62%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

MTZ’s Return on Invested Capital of 7.62% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their ROIC against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

APG

3.36%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

APG’s Net Profit Margin of 3.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MTZ

1.72%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 1.72% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

APG

6.66%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

APG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.66% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MTZ

4.66%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.66% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPGMTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)8.18%7.56%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.96%2.41%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)5.74%7.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.36%1.72%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.66%4.66%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.45%12.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

APG

1.47

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

APG’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MTZ

1.22

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 falls into the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

APG

1.02

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

APG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Engineering & Construction industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.02. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MTZ

0.91

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

MTZ’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Engineering & Construction industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.91. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

APG

3.17

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

In the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, APG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.17 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MTZ

3.22

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPGMTZ
Current Ratio (TTM)1.471.22
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.381.18
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.020.91
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.380.30
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)3.302.41
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.173.22

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for APG and MTZ. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

APG

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MTZ

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

APG

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MTZ

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPGMTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

APG

39.62

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

APG’s P/E Ratio of 39.62 is within the middle range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MTZ

62.84

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

A P/E Ratio of 62.84 places MTZ in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

APG

3.35

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

MTZ

3.22

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

APG

1.33

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

APG’s P/S Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MTZ

1.09

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.09 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

APG

3.19

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

APG’s P/B Ratio of 3.19 is within the conventional range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MTZ

4.66

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.66 is within the conventional range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APG vs. MTZ: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPGMTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)39.6262.84
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.353.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.331.09
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.194.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)15.8114.72
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)15.4716.72
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.691.27