Seek Returns logo

APG vs. LMT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APG and LMT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPGLMT
Company NameAPi Group CorporationLockheed Martin Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization14.71 billion USD120.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 29, 2020January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APG and LMT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APG vs. LMT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPGLMT
5-Day Price Return2.67%2.94%
13-Week Price Return2.52%11.01%
26-Week Price Return56.39%13.03%
52-Week Price Return65.78%-15.11%
Month-to-Date Return2.88%2.97%
Year-to-Date Return47.46%5.78%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.85M1.10M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.38M1.63M
3-Month Volatility20.57%25.98%
Beta1.740.24

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APG

8.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

APG’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

LMT

65.82%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 65.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

APG vs. LMT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APG

3.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

APG’s Net Profit Margin of 3.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LMT

5.85%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APG vs. LMT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APG

6.54%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

APG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.54% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LMT

8.29%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.29% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APG vs. LMT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPGLMT
Return on Equity (TTM)8.22%65.82%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.00%7.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.35%5.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.54%8.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.08%8.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APG

1.45

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

APG’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LMT

0.99

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

LMT’s Current Ratio of 0.99 falls into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

APG vs. LMT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APG

0.96

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

APG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.96 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LMT

4.06

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.06, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

APG vs. LMT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APG

3.16

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, APG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LMT

7.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APG vs. LMT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPGLMT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.450.99
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.290.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.964.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.167.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

APG vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APG vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

APG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LMT

2.58%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.58%, LMT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

APG vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

APG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LMT

73.60%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 73.60% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

APG vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPGLMT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%73.60%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APG

59.94

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

At 59.94, APG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LMT

28.51

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

LMT’s P/E Ratio of 28.51 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APG vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APG

2.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

APG’s P/S Ratio of 2.01 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LMT

1.67

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APG vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APG

4.46

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

APG’s P/B Ratio of 4.46 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LMT

20.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

At 20.34, LMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

APG vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPGLMT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)59.9428.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.011.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.4620.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.1224.05
APG vs. LMT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison