APG vs. LII: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 23, 2025

Here’s a clear look at APG and LII, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	APG	LII
Company Name	APi Group Corporation	Lennox International Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Building Products
Market Capitalization	14.73 billion USD	20.69 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	April 29, 2020	July 29, 1999
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APG and LII by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APG vs. LII: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	APG	LII
5-Day Price Return	-1.31%	-1.68%
13-Week Price Return	15.59%	-2.55%
26-Week Price Return	41.14%	-4.98%
52-Week Price Return	55.06%	1.89%
Month-to-Date Return	-1.94%	-3.27%
Year-to-Date Return	47.50%	-3.32%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.57M	0.33M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.64M	0.39M
3-Month Volatility	21.67%	30.56%
Beta	1.65	1.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APG

8.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 29.61%
Q3: 17.18%
Median: 10.42%
Q1: 8.10%
Min: -0.10%

APG’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LII

99.44%

Building Products Industry

Max: 48.58%
Q3: 27.65%
Median: 16.01%
Q1: 8.81%
Min: -6.66%

LII’s Return on Equity of 99.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Building Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

APG vs. LII: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APG

3.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.14%
Q3: 6.17%
Median: 3.85%
Q1: 2.40%
Min: -0.05%

APG’s Net Profit Margin of 3.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LII

15.41%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.11%
Q3: 15.09%
Median: 9.48%
Q1: 5.16%
Min: -3.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.41% places LII in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

APG vs. LII: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APG

6.54%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.56%
Q3: 9.36%
Median: 5.46%
Q1: 3.47%
Min: -1.93%

APG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.54% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LII

19.52%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.67%
Q3: 18.75%
Median: 14.89%
Q1: 8.70%
Min: -1.00%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.52% places LII in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

APG vs. LII: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	APG	LII
Return on Equity (TTM)	8.22%	99.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)	3.00%	24.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	3.35%	15.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	6.54%	19.52%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	31.08%	33.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APG

1.45

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 1.98
Q3: 1.53
Median: 1.24
Q1: 1.05
Min: 0.66

APG’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LII

1.41

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.87
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.60
Q1: 1.32
Min: 0.88

LII’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APG vs. LII: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APG

0.96

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.49
Q3: 1.19
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

APG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.96 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LII

1.31

Building Products Industry

Max: 1.64
Q3: 1.02
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

LII’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.31. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

APG vs. LII: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APG

3.16

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 23.59
Q3: 14.49
Median: 8.20
Q1: 5.26
Min: -6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, APG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LII

26.81

Building Products Industry

Max: 72.12
Q3: 34.39
Median: 15.31
Q1: 6.06
Min: 0.85

LII’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.81 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APG vs. LII: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	APG	LII
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.45	1.41
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.29	0.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.96	1.31
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	3.16	26.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

APG vs. LII: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APG vs. LII: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 6.28%
Q3: 3.25%
Median: 2.02%
Q1: 0.23%
Min: 0.00%

APG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LII

0.77%

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.56%
Q3: 1.94%
Median: 1.04%
Q1: 0.66%
Min: 0.00%

LII’s Dividend Yield of 0.77% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

APG vs. LII: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 69.47%
Median: 40.99%
Q1: 10.51%
Min: 0.00%

APG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LII

19.61%

Building Products Industry

Max: 157.36%
Q3: 77.74%
Median: 29.49%
Q1: 16.25%
Min: 0.00%

LII’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.61% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APG vs. LII: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	APG	LII
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	19.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APG

60.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.96
Q3: 24.81
Median: 15.45
Q1: 12.51
Min: 2.74

At 60.01, APG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LII

25.59

Building Products Industry

Max: 66.79
Q3: 37.37
Median: 21.86
Q1: 17.57
Min: 9.70

LII’s P/E Ratio of 25.59 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APG vs. LII: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APG

2.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 3.22
Q3: 1.63
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.48
Min: 0.11

APG’s P/S Ratio of 2.01 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LII

3.94

Building Products Industry

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.25
Median: 1.65
Q1: 1.11
Min: 0.34

LII’s P/S Ratio of 3.94 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

APG vs. LII: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APG

4.46

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.74
Q3: 3.33
Median: 1.49
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.23

APG’s P/B Ratio of 4.46 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LII

22.59

Building Products Industry

Max: 13.31
Q3: 6.85
Median: 3.20
Q1: 1.71
Min: 0.73

At 22.59, LII’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

APG vs. LII: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	APG	LII
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	60.01	25.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.01	3.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.46	22.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	26.16	28.81