Seek Returns logo

APG vs. CRS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APG and CRS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPGCRS
Company NameAPi Group CorporationCarpenter Technology Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsMaterials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringMetals & Mining
Market Capitalization14.96 billion USD12.16 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 29, 2020February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APG and CRS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APG vs. CRS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPGCRS
5-Day Price Return1.67%0.00%
13-Week Price Return17.98%6.92%
26-Week Price Return33.63%14.81%
52-Week Price Return53.81%70.01%
Month-to-Date Return-0.30%-3.11%
Year-to-Date Return49.96%42.38%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.34M0.75M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.63M0.96M
3-Month Volatility21.70%35.57%
Beta1.651.52

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APG

8.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

APG’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRS

21.35%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

APG vs. CRS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APG

3.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

APG’s Net Profit Margin of 3.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CRS

13.07%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APG vs. CRS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APG

6.54%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

APG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.54% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRS

18.14%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.14% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APG vs. CRS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPGCRS
Return on Equity (TTM)8.22%21.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.00%11.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.35%13.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.54%18.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.08%26.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APG

1.45

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

APG’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRS

3.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.65 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

APG vs. CRS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APG

0.96

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

APG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.96 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRS

0.37

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APG vs. CRS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APG

3.16

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, APG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APG vs. CRS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPGCRS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.453.65
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.292.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.960.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.1613.14

Growth

Revenue Growth

APG vs. CRS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APG vs. CRS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

APG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRS

0.34%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.34% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

APG vs. CRS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

APG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRS

14.36%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.36% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APG vs. CRS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPGCRS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.34%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%14.36%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APG

60.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 60.01, APG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CRS

31.90

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

CRS’s P/E Ratio of 31.90 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APG vs. CRS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APG

2.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

APG’s P/S Ratio of 2.01 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CRS

4.17

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.17 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

APG vs. CRS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APG

4.46

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

APG’s P/B Ratio of 4.46 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CRS

7.29

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

At 7.29, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

APG vs. CRS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPGCRS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)60.0131.90
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.014.17
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.467.29
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.1641.93