Seek Returns logo

APG vs. BLD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APG and BLD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPGBLD
Company NameAPi Group CorporationTopBuild Corp.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization14.96 billion USD12.22 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 29, 2020June 17, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APG and BLD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APG vs. BLD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPGBLD
5-Day Price Return1.67%-0.90%
13-Week Price Return17.98%53.01%
26-Week Price Return33.63%34.11%
52-Week Price Return53.81%11.71%
Month-to-Date Return-0.30%15.97%
Year-to-Date Return49.96%37.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.34M0.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.63M0.39M
3-Month Volatility21.70%38.13%
Beta1.651.69

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APG

8.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

APG’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BLD

27.70%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

BLD’s Return on Equity of 27.70% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

APG vs. BLD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APG

3.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

APG’s Net Profit Margin of 3.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BLD

11.40%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.40% places BLD in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

APG vs. BLD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APG

6.54%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

APG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.54% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BLD

16.46%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.46% places BLD in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

APG vs. BLD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPGBLD
Return on Equity (TTM)8.22%27.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.00%12.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.35%11.40%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.54%16.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.08%30.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APG

1.45

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

APG’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BLD

2.83

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

BLD’s Current Ratio of 2.83 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APG vs. BLD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APG

0.96

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

APG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.96 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BLD

0.88

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

BLD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APG vs. BLD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APG

3.16

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, APG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

BLD

12.50

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

BLD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APG vs. BLD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPGBLD
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.452.83
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.292.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.960.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.1612.50

Growth

Revenue Growth

APG vs. BLD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APG vs. BLD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

APG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BLD

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

BLD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

APG vs. BLD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

APG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BLD

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

BLD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

APG vs. BLD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPGBLD
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APG

60.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 60.01, APG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BLD

19.83

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 19.83 places BLD in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

APG vs. BLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APG

2.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

APG’s P/S Ratio of 2.01 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BLD

2.26

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 2.26, BLD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

APG vs. BLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APG

4.46

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

APG’s P/B Ratio of 4.46 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BLD

4.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 4.32, BLD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

APG vs. BLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPGBLD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)60.0119.83
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.012.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.464.32
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.1614.83