Seek Returns logo

APG vs. ARMK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APG and ARMK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPGARMK
Company NameAPi Group CorporationAramark
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization14.73 billion USD10.53 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 29, 2020December 12, 2013
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APG and ARMK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APG vs. ARMK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPGARMK
5-Day Price Return-1.31%-3.09%
13-Week Price Return15.59%0.59%
26-Week Price Return41.14%4.22%
52-Week Price Return55.06%10.19%
Month-to-Date Return-1.94%-7.24%
Year-to-Date Return47.50%5.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.57M2.69M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.64M1.95M
3-Month Volatility21.67%24.63%
Beta1.651.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APG

8.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

APG’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ARMK

11.83%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

ARMK’s Return on Equity of 11.83% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APG vs. ARMK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APG

3.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

APG’s Net Profit Margin of 3.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ARMK

2.02%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, ARMK’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

APG vs. ARMK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APG

6.54%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

APG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.54% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ARMK

4.44%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

ARMK’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.44% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

APG vs. ARMK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPGARMK
Return on Equity (TTM)8.22%11.83%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.00%2.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.35%2.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.54%4.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.08%8.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APG

1.45

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

APG’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ARMK

1.29

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

ARMK’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APG vs. ARMK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APG

0.96

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

APG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.96 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ARMK

2.04

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

ARMK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.04 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APG vs. ARMK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APG

3.16

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, APG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ARMK

2.07

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

ARMK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APG vs. ARMK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPGARMK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.451.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.291.06
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.962.04
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.162.07

Growth

Revenue Growth

APG vs. ARMK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APG vs. ARMK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

APG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ARMK

1.04%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARMK’s Dividend Yield of 1.04% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

APG vs. ARMK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

APG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ARMK

29.94%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARMK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.94% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APG vs. ARMK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPGARMK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.04%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%29.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APG

60.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 60.01, APG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ARMK

28.69

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

ARMK’s P/E Ratio of 28.69 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APG vs. ARMK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APG

2.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

APG’s P/S Ratio of 2.01 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ARMK

0.58

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, ARMK’s P/S Ratio of 0.58 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

APG vs. ARMK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APG

4.46

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

APG’s P/B Ratio of 4.46 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ARMK

3.58

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

ARMK’s P/B Ratio of 3.58 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APG vs. ARMK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPGARMK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)60.0128.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.010.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.463.58
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.169.63