Seek Returns logo

APD vs. LYB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APD and LYB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPDLYB
Company NameAir Products and Chemicals, Inc.LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryChemicalsChemicals
Market Capitalization57.30 billion USD14.35 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980April 28, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APD and LYB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APD vs. LYB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPDLYB
5-Day Price Return0.35%5.92%
13-Week Price Return-10.71%-15.14%
26-Week Price Return-5.23%-24.93%
52-Week Price Return-17.11%-45.71%
Month-to-Date Return6.90%-2.41%
Year-to-Date Return-10.58%-39.01%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.67M5.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.07M4.91M
3-Month Volatility25.83%35.41%
Beta0.870.75

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APD

-2.55%

Chemicals Industry

Max
29.52%
Q3
13.18%
Median
6.58%
Q1
1.08%
Min
-12.53%

APD has a negative Return on Equity of -2.55%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

LYB

-10.18%

Chemicals Industry

Max
29.52%
Q3
13.18%
Median
6.58%
Q1
1.08%
Min
-12.53%

LYB has a negative Return on Equity of -10.18%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

APD vs. LYB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APD

-3.28%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.17%
Q3
9.38%
Median
4.26%
Q1
0.56%
Min
-8.93%

APD has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3.28%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

LYB

-3.69%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.17%
Q3
9.38%
Median
4.26%
Q1
0.56%
Min
-8.93%

LYB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3.69%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

APD vs. LYB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APD

-7.29%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.38%
Q3
14.36%
Median
7.98%
Q1
3.60%
Min
-9.26%

APD has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -7.29%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

LYB

-3.09%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.38%
Q3
14.36%
Median
7.98%
Q1
3.60%
Min
-9.26%

LYB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.09%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

APD vs. LYB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPDLYB
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.55%-10.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.98%-3.43%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-3.28%-3.69%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-7.29%-3.09%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.41%9.19%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APD

1.38

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.27
Median
1.75
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

APD’s Current Ratio of 1.38 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LYB

1.57

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.27
Median
1.75
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

LYB’s Current Ratio of 1.57 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APD vs. LYB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APD

1.18

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
1.00
Median
0.65
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

APD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Chemicals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.18. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LYB

1.12

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
1.00
Median
0.65
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

LYB’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Chemicals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.12. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

APD vs. LYB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APD

709.00

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
27.42
Median
9.48
Q1
3.36
Min
-9.39

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 709.00, APD demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Chemicals industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LYB

3.85

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
27.42
Median
9.48
Q1
3.36
Min
-9.39

LYB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.85 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APD vs. LYB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPDLYB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.381.57
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.160.82
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.181.12
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)709.003.85

Growth

Revenue Growth

APD vs. LYB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APD vs. LYB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APD

2.74%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.88%
Q3
3.88%
Median
2.60%
Q1
1.39%
Min
0.00%

APD’s Dividend Yield of 2.74% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LYB

12.06%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.88%
Q3
3.88%
Median
2.60%
Q1
1.39%
Min
0.00%

LYB’s Dividend Yield of 12.06% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Chemicals industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

APD vs. LYB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APD

89.09%

Chemicals Industry

Max
192.00%
Q3
109.29%
Median
62.55%
Q1
30.93%
Min
0.00%

APD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 89.09% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LYB

152.02%

Chemicals Industry

Max
192.00%
Q3
109.29%
Median
62.55%
Q1
30.93%
Min
0.00%

LYB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 152.02% is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

APD vs. LYB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPDLYB
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.74%12.06%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)89.09%152.02%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APD

--

Chemicals Industry

Max
48.58
Q3
28.65
Median
19.88
Q1
14.03
Min
6.73

P/E Ratio data for APD is currently unavailable.

LYB

--

Chemicals Industry

Max
48.58
Q3
28.65
Median
19.88
Q1
14.03
Min
6.73

P/E Ratio data for LYB is currently unavailable.

APD vs. LYB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APD

4.79

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.61
Q3
2.21
Median
0.95
Q1
0.58
Min
0.17

With a P/S Ratio of 4.79, APD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LYB

0.45

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.61
Q3
2.21
Median
0.95
Q1
0.58
Min
0.17

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, LYB’s P/S Ratio of 0.45 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

APD vs. LYB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APD

4.04

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.60
Q3
2.61
Median
1.50
Q1
0.96
Min
0.33

APD’s P/B Ratio of 4.04 is in the upper tier for the Chemicals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LYB

1.49

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.60
Q3
2.61
Median
1.50
Q1
0.96
Min
0.33

LYB’s P/B Ratio of 1.49 is within the conventional range for the Chemicals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APD vs. LYB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPDLYB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.790.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.041.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)104.247.33