APD vs. HL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APD and HL, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
APD dominates in value with a market cap of 60.01 billion USD, eclipsing HL’s 3.21 billion USD by roughly 18.71×.
HL carries a higher beta at 1.57, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while APD remains steadier at 0.89.
| Symbol | APD | HL |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Hecla Mining Company |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Gold |
| CEO | Mr. Eduardo F. Menezes | Mr. Robert L. Krcmarov |
| Price | 269.67 USD | 5.07 USD |
| Market Cap | 60.01 billion USD | 3.21 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.89 | 1.57 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | March 17, 1980 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APD and HL over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APD and HL based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- APD has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -13.85, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, HL (P/FCF 45.79) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | APD | HL |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 39.17 | 25.51 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 5.00 | 1.91 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.99 | 2.41 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.08 | 1.55 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -13.85 | 45.79 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.15 | 10.81 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.24 | 2.41 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -17.31 | 45.92 |
Dividend Comparison
APD’s dividend yield of 2.63% is about 256% higher than HL’s 0.74%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | APD | HL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.63% | 0.74% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APD and HL, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- APD’s current ratio of 1.00 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while HL at 1.43 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
| Symbol | APD | HL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.00 | 1.43 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.85 | 1.16 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.12 | 0.02 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.42 | 0.01 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.66 | 5.59 |