Seek Returns

APA vs. COP: APA vs. ConocoPhillips Stock Comparison

How do APA (APA) and ConocoPhillips (COP) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

APA (APA) and ConocoPhillips (COP) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for APA (APA) and ConocoPhillips (COP)
Profile ItemAPACOP
NameAPA CorporationConocoPhillips
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Capitalization14.98 billion USD161.12 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateMay 15, 1979December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

APA
COP
GSPC
Loading price history…
APA (APA) vs. ConocoPhillips (COP), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for APA (APA) and ConocoPhillips (COP). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for APA (APA) and ConocoPhillips (COP). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for APA (APA) and ConocoPhillips (COP)
MetricAPACOP
Total Return (1Y)92.90%62.02%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)11.25%9.29%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)11.68%16.40%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

APA
COP
GSPC
Loading price history…
APA (APA) vs. ConocoPhillips (COP), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for APA (APA) and ConocoPhillips (COP). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for APA (APA) and ConocoPhillips (COP)
MetricAPACOP
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)44.92%31.63%
Beta (5Y)0.340.19
Max Drawdown (5Y)-70.47%-36.30%
Avg. Volume (3M)5.66M6.60M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
APA and COP are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for APA (APA) and ConocoPhillips (COP)
MetricAPACOP
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.971.83
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.942.70

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

APA (APA) at 33.32% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 17.66% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for APA.

APA

Energy industry group

33.32%

Max
53.85%
APA
33.32%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

COP

Energy industry group

17.66%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
COP
17.66%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. ConocoPhillips (COP): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

APA (APA) at 23.49% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of ConocoPhillips (COP) at 16.76%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

APA

Energy industry group

23.49%

Max
56.92%
APA
23.49%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

COP

Energy industry group

16.76%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
COP
16.76%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. ConocoPhillips (COP): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

APA (APA) at 44.25% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of ConocoPhillips (COP) at 30.05%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

APA

Energy industry group

44.25%

Max
71.31%
APA
44.25%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

COP

Energy industry group

30.05%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
COP
30.05%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. ConocoPhillips (COP): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for APA (APA) and ConocoPhillips (COP)
MetricAPACOP
ROE (TTM)33.32%17.66%
ROA (TTM)14.06%8.98%
Net Margin (TTM)23.49%16.76%
Operating Margin (TTM)44.25%30.05%
Gross Margin (TTM)78.98%49.01%

Growth

Revenue Growth

ConocoPhillips (COP) at 7.67% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while APA (APA) at -8.39% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. ConocoPhillips (COP): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

APA (APA) at 75.77% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at -18.69% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for APA.

Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. ConocoPhillips (COP): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for APA (APA) and ConocoPhillips (COP)
MetricAPACOP
Revenue Growth (YoY)-8.39%7.67%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-6.96%-9.11%
EPS Growth (YoY)75.77%-18.69%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-28.73%-24.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.52 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while APA (APA) at 0.85 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for APA.

APA

Energy industry group

0.85

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
APA
0.85
Min
0.24

COP

Energy industry group

1.52

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
COP
1.52
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. ConocoPhillips (COP): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both APA (APA) at 0.42 and ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.35 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

APA

Energy industry group

0.42

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
APA
0.42
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

COP

Energy industry group

0.35

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
COP
0.35
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. ConocoPhillips (COP): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for APA (APA) and ConocoPhillips (COP)
MetricAPACOP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.851.52
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.420.35
Net Debt / EBITDA0.530.45

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both APA (APA) at 2.30% and ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.48% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

APA

Energy industry group

2.30%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
APA
2.30%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

COP

Energy industry group

2.48%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
COP
2.48%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. ConocoPhillips (COP): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both APA (APA) at 16.26% and ConocoPhillips (COP) at 35.41% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

APA

Energy industry group

16.26%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
APA
16.26%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

COP

Energy industry group

35.41%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
COP
35.41%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. ConocoPhillips (COP): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for APA (APA) and ConocoPhillips (COP)
MetricAPACOP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.30%2.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)16.26%35.41%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

APA (APA) at 7.26 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 14.36 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for APA, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

APA

Energy industry group

7.26

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
APA
7.26
Min
2.99

COP

Energy industry group

14.36

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
COP
14.36
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. ConocoPhillips (COP): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both APA (APA) at 1.62 and ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.34 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

APA

Energy industry group

1.62

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
APA
1.62
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

COP

Energy industry group

2.34

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
COP
2.34
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. ConocoPhillips (COP): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

APA (APA) at 2.11 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.44 carries an above-peer premium to book — COP is pricier on assets.

APA

Energy industry group

2.11

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
APA
2.11
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

COP

Energy industry group

2.44

Max
4.21
COP
2.44
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. ConocoPhillips (COP): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for APA (APA) and ConocoPhillips (COP)
MetricAPACOP
P/E Ratio (TTM)7.2614.36
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.622.34
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.112.44
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)14.08%7.12%