AON vs. BCS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AON and BCS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AON (77.32 billion USD) and BCS (62.70 billion USD) sit neck-and-neck in market cap terms.
AON at 0.89 and BCS at 1.05 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Quick note: BCS sports an ADR tag, marking it as a foreign player on U.S. exchanges, unlike the homegrown AON.
Symbol | AON | BCS |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Aon plc | Barclays PLC |
Country | IE | GB |
Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
Industry | Insurance - Brokers | Banks - Diversified |
CEO | Mr. Gregory Clarence Case | Mr. Coimbatore Sundararajan Venkatakrishnan Ph.D. |
Price | 358.06 USD | 17.57 USD |
Market Cap | 77.32 billion USD | 62.70 billion USD |
Beta | 0.89 | 1.046 |
Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
IPO Date | June 2, 1980 | September 9, 1986 |
ADR | No | Yes |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AON and BCS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AON and BCS, please refer to the table below.
Symbol | AON | BCS |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 30.41 | 7.39 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 0.50 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.73 | 1.72 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 11.06 | 0.63 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 29.29 | 0.00 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 18.44 | -20.59 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 5.80 | -3.06 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 35.93 | 0.00 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AON at 0.77% and BCS at 2.59% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet BCS’s 2.59% yield, 235% above AON’s 0.77%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while AON leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.
Symbol | AON | BCS |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.77% | 2.59% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AON and BCS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- BCS’s current ratio of 0.67 dips below 1, leaving short-term liabilities larger than current assets—a scenario that could hinge on cash flow support. On the other hand, AON at 1.05 has enough assets to handle its obligations.
- At 0.67, BCS’s quick ratio falls below 0.8, where liquid assets, minus inventory, can’t keep up with short-term bills—possibly riding on cash flow. By contrast, AON hits 1.05, covering its bases comfortably.
- BCS’s interest coverage comes up “--”, reflecting interest demands so faint they’re barely there—likely minimal debt or tiny rates—whereas AON at 0.00 cruises past interest with ease.
Symbol | AON | BCS |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.05 | 0.67 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.05 | 0.67 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.64 | 1.48 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.37 | 0.07 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 4.51 | -- |