Seek Returns logo

ANSS vs. NTAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ANSS and NTAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ANSS’s market capitalization of 32.31 billion USD is substantially larger than NTAP’s 21.49 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.19 for ANSS and 1.41 for NTAP, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolANSSNTAP
Company NameANSYS, Inc.NetApp, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationComputer Hardware
CEOAjei S. GopalGeorge Kurian
Price367.48 USD107.26 USD
Market Cap32.31 billion USD21.49 billion USD
Beta1.191.41
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateJune 20, 1996November 21, 1995
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ANSS and NTAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ANSS vs. NTAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ANSS

10.01%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

ANSS’s Return on Equity of 10.01% is on par with the norm for the Software - Application industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NTAP

123.03%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
123.03%
Q3
15.78%
Median
-13.44%
Q1
-119.16%
Min
-227.95%

In the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, NTAP’s Return on Equity of 123.03% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ANSS

8.28%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

ANSS’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.28% is in line with the norm for the Software - Application industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

NTAP

16.49%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
30.37%
Q3
20.44%
Median
7.03%
Q1
-12.47%
Min
-31.70%

NTAP’s Return on Invested Capital of 16.49% is in line with the norm for the Computer Hardware industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ANSS

22.95%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.95% places ANSS in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NTAP

18.05%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
40.72%
Q3
10.87%
Median
4.33%
Q1
-378.64%
Min
-753.20%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.05% places NTAP in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ANSS

28.87%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.87% places ANSS in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NTAP

20.34%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
13.53%
Median
4.56%
Q1
-295.01%
Min
-592.84%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.34% places NTAP in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolANSSNTAP
Return on Equity (TTM)10.01%123.03%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.43%10.96%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)8.28%16.49%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.95%18.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)28.87%20.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)88.78%70.19%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ANSS

3.66

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

ANSS’s Current Ratio of 3.66 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

NTAP

1.26

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
20.73
Q3
11.54
Median
2.69
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.26 falls into the lower quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ANSS

0.14

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ANSS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Software - Application industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NTAP

3.36

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.67
Median
0.04
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.36, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Computer Hardware industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ANSS

16.34

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

ANSS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.34 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

NTAP

31.09

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
32.50
Q3
21.85
Median
4.98
Q1
-7.71
Min
-34.24

NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.09 is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolANSSNTAP
Current Ratio (TTM)3.661.26
Quick Ratio (TTM)3.661.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.143.36
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.100.32
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-1.000.47
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.3431.09

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ANSS and NTAP. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ANSS

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANSS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTAP

1.94%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.24%
Q3
1.58%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.94%, NTAP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Computer Hardware industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ANSS

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANSS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTAP

35.75%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
193.79%
Q3
30.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.75% is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolANSSNTAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.94%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%35.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ANSS

54.22

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

ANSS’s P/E Ratio of 54.22 is within the middle range for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTAP

18.36

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
24.60
Q3
24.01
Median
20.31
Q1
18.24
Min
13.38

NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 18.36 is within the middle range for the Computer Hardware industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ANSS

6.92

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

A Forward PEG Ratio of 6.92 places ANSS in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

NTAP

2.15

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.77
Q3
5.18
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ANSS

12.51

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

ANSS’s P/S Ratio of 12.51 is in the upper echelon for the Software - Application industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NTAP

3.27

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
57.61
Q3
47.40
Median
3.37
Q1
1.56
Min
0.43

NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.27 aligns with the market consensus for the Computer Hardware industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ANSS

5.20

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

NTAP

20.94

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
21.21
Q3
14.71
Median
9.28
Q1
3.74
Min
0.43

NTAP’s P/B Ratio of 20.94 is in the upper tier for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ANSS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolANSSNTAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)54.2218.36
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)6.922.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)12.513.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.2020.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)37.2716.06
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)33.8913.94
EV-to-Sales (TTM)12.153.38