Seek Returns logo

ANSS vs. IONQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ANSS and IONQ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ANSS’s market capitalization of 32.31 billion USD is substantially larger than IONQ’s 11.61 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

IONQ carries a higher beta at 2.59, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ANSS (beta: 1.19) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolANSSIONQ
Company NameANSYS, Inc.IonQ, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationComputer Hardware
CEOAjei S. GopalNiccolo Mcleod de Masi
Price367.48 USD44.39 USD
Market Cap32.31 billion USD11.61 billion USD
Beta1.192.59
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateJune 20, 1996January 4, 2021
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ANSS and IONQ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ANSS vs. IONQ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ANSS

10.01%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

ANSS’s Return on Equity of 10.01% is on par with the norm for the Software - Application industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IONQ

-63.35%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
123.03%
Q3
15.78%
Median
-13.44%
Q1
-119.16%
Min
-227.95%

IONQ has a negative Return on Equity of -63.35%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ANSS

8.28%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

ANSS’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.28% is in line with the norm for the Software - Application industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

IONQ

-31.70%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
30.37%
Q3
20.44%
Median
7.03%
Q1
-12.47%
Min
-31.70%

IONQ has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -31.70%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ANSS

22.95%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.95% places ANSS in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IONQ

-753.20%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
40.72%
Q3
10.87%
Median
4.33%
Q1
-378.64%
Min
-753.20%

IONQ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -753.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ANSS

28.87%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.87% places ANSS in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IONQ

-592.84%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
13.53%
Median
4.56%
Q1
-295.01%
Min
-592.84%

IONQ has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -592.84%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolANSSIONQ
Return on Equity (TTM)10.01%-63.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.43%-38.15%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)8.28%-31.70%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.95%-753.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)28.87%-592.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)88.78%50.07%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ANSS

3.66

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

ANSS’s Current Ratio of 3.66 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

IONQ

13.17

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
20.73
Q3
11.54
Median
2.69
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

IONQ’s Current Ratio of 13.17 is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ANSS

0.14

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ANSS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Software - Application industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IONQ

0.02

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.67
Median
0.04
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, IONQ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ANSS

16.34

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

ANSS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.34 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

IONQ

--

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
32.50
Q3
21.85
Median
4.98
Q1
-7.71
Min
-34.24

Interest Coverage Ratio data for IONQ is currently unavailable.

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolANSSIONQ
Current Ratio (TTM)3.6613.17
Quick Ratio (TTM)3.6612.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.140.02
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.100.02
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-1.000.61
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.34--

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ANSS and IONQ. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ANSS

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANSS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IONQ

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.24%
Q3
1.58%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ANSS

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANSS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IONQ

-0.01%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
193.79%
Q3
30.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -0.01%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolANSSIONQ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%-0.01%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ANSS

54.22

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

ANSS’s P/E Ratio of 54.22 is within the middle range for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IONQ

-31.31

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
24.60
Q3
24.01
Median
20.31
Q1
18.24
Min
13.38

IONQ has a negative P/E Ratio of -31.31. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ANSS

6.92

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

A Forward PEG Ratio of 6.92 places ANSS in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

IONQ

13.67

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.77
Q3
5.18
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ANSS

12.51

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

ANSS’s P/S Ratio of 12.51 is in the upper echelon for the Software - Application industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

IONQ

269.73

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
57.61
Q3
47.40
Median
3.37
Q1
1.56
Min
0.43

With a P/S Ratio of 269.73, IONQ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Computer Hardware industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ANSS

5.20

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

IONQ

13.27

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
21.21
Q3
14.71
Median
9.28
Q1
3.74
Min
0.43

IONQ’s P/B Ratio of 13.27 is within the conventional range for the Computer Hardware industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ANSS vs. IONQ: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolANSSIONQ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)54.22-31.31
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)6.9213.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)12.51269.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.2013.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)37.27-59.29
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)33.89-49.02
EV-to-Sales (TTM)12.15266.43