Seek Returns logo

ANSS vs. GLW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ANSS and GLW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ANSS’s market capitalization stands at 32.31 billion USD, while GLW’s is 45.43 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 1.19 for ANSS and 1.10 for GLW, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolANSSGLW
Company NameANSYS, Inc.Corning Incorporated
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationHardware, Equipment & Parts
CEOAjei S. GopalWendell P. Weeks
Price367.48 USD53.04 USD
Market Cap32.31 billion USD45.43 billion USD
Beta1.191.10
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateJune 20, 1996December 31, 1981
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ANSS and GLW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ANSS vs. GLW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ANSS

10.01%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

ANSS’s Return on Equity of 10.01% is on par with the norm for the Software - Application industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GLW

4.21%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

GLW’s Return on Equity of 4.21% is on par with the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Application and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ANSS

8.28%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

ANSS’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.28% is in line with the norm for the Software - Application industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

GLW

4.70%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

GLW’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.70% is in line with the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Application and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ANSS

22.95%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.95% places ANSS in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GLW

3.34%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

GLW’s Net Profit Margin of 3.34% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Application and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ANSS

28.87%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.87% places ANSS in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GLW

10.98%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

GLW’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.98% is around the midpoint for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Application and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolANSSGLW
Return on Equity (TTM)10.01%4.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.43%1.66%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)8.28%4.70%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.95%3.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)28.87%10.98%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)88.78%32.97%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ANSS

3.66

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

ANSS’s Current Ratio of 3.66 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GLW

1.69

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

GLW’s Current Ratio of 1.69 falls into the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ANSS

0.14

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ANSS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Software - Application industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GLW

0.76

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

GLW’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.76. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ANSS

16.34

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

ANSS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.34 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

GLW

4.55

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

GLW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.55 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Application and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolANSSGLW
Current Ratio (TTM)3.661.69
Quick Ratio (TTM)3.661.05
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.140.76
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.100.30
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-1.002.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.344.55

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ANSS and GLW. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ANSS

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANSS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GLW

2.11%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.11%, GLW offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Application and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ANSS

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANSS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GLW

216.96%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GLW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 216.96% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolANSSGLW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%216.96%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ANSS

54.22

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

ANSS’s P/E Ratio of 54.22 is within the middle range for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GLW

99.89

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

At 99.89, GLW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ANSS

6.92

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

A Forward PEG Ratio of 6.92 places ANSS in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

GLW

7.95

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ANSS

12.51

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

ANSS’s P/S Ratio of 12.51 is in the upper echelon for the Software - Application industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GLW

3.34

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

GLW’s P/S Ratio of 3.34 aligns with the market consensus for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ANSS

5.20

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

GLW

4.23

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

GLW’s P/B Ratio of 4.23 is within the conventional range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ANSS vs. GLW: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolANSSGLW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)54.2299.89
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)6.927.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)12.513.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.204.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)37.2742.34
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)33.8922.34
EV-to-Sales (TTM)12.153.84