Seek Returns logo

ANSS vs. CRWV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ANSS and CRWV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

CRWV’s market capitalization of 78.90 billion USD is significantly greater than ANSS’s 32.31 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

SymbolANSSCRWV
Company NameANSYS, Inc.CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - Infrastructure
CEOAjei S. GopalMichael N. Intrator
Price367.48 USD164.38 USD
Market Cap32.31 billion USD78.90 billion USD
Beta1.19--
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateJune 20, 1996March 28, 2025
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ANSS and CRWV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ANSS vs. CRWV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ANSS

10.01%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

ANSS’s Return on Equity of 10.01% is on par with the norm for the Software - Application industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRWV

-90.88%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

CRWV has a negative Return on Equity of -90.88%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Application and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ANSS

8.28%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

ANSS’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.28% is in line with the norm for the Software - Application industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

CRWV

0.65%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

CRWV’s Return on Invested Capital of 0.65% is in line with the norm for the Software - Infrastructure industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Application and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ANSS

22.95%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.95% places ANSS in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRWV

-25.83%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

CRWV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -25.83%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Application and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ANSS

28.87%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.87% places ANSS in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRWV

5.32%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

CRWV’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.32% is around the midpoint for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Application and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolANSSCRWV
Return on Equity (TTM)10.01%-90.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.43%-2.27%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)8.28%0.65%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.95%-25.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)28.87%5.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)88.78%73.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ANSS

3.66

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

ANSS’s Current Ratio of 3.66 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CRWV

0.44

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

CRWV’s Current Ratio of 0.44 falls into the lower quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ANSS

0.14

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ANSS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Software - Application industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRWV

3.88

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.88, CRWV operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Software - Infrastructure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ANSS

16.34

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

ANSS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.34 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CRWV

0.23

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

CRWV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.23 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Application and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolANSSCRWV
Current Ratio (TTM)3.660.44
Quick Ratio (TTM)3.660.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.143.88
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.100.54
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-1.0011.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.340.23

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ANSS and CRWV. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ANSS

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANSS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRWV

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Application and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ANSS

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANSS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRWV

-11.01%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -11.01%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolANSSCRWV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%-11.01%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ANSS

54.22

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

ANSS’s P/E Ratio of 54.22 is within the middle range for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRWV

-81.52

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

CRWV has a negative P/E Ratio of -81.52. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ANSS

6.92

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

A Forward PEG Ratio of 6.92 places ANSS in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

CRWV

0.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

In the lower quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry, CRWV’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.51 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ANSS

12.51

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

ANSS’s P/S Ratio of 12.51 is in the upper echelon for the Software - Application industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CRWV

41.14

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 41.14, CRWV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ANSS

5.20

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

CRWV

13.15

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

ANSS vs. CRWV: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Application and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolANSSCRWV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)54.22-81.52
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)6.920.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)12.5141.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.2013.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)37.27-18.10
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)33.8996.24
EV-to-Sales (TTM)12.1546.68