Seek Returns logo

ANF vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ANF and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolANFLULU
Company NameAbercrombie & Fitch Co.lululemon athletica inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization3.58 billion USD20.73 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 26, 1996July 27, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ANF and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ANF vs. LULU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolANFLULU
5-Day Price Return-11.11%-1.90%
13-Week Price Return-12.51%-25.89%
26-Week Price Return8.38%-31.62%
52-Week Price Return-45.23%-35.84%
Month-to-Date Return-10.99%-1.75%
Year-to-Date Return-49.05%-54.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.96M3.90M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.05M4.69M
3-Month Volatility45.95%49.37%
Beta1.251.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ANF

42.73%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
64.63%
Q3
37.13%
Median
19.07%
Q1
10.79%
Min
-16.66%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, ANF’s Return on Equity of 42.73% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LULU

42.05%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 42.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ANF vs. LULU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ANF

10.61%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.04%
Q3
10.99%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-4.37%

ANF’s Net Profit Margin of 10.61% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LULU

16.38%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.38% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ANF vs. LULU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ANF

14.58%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
16.40%
Median
9.28%
Q1
4.05%
Min
-10.63%

ANF’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.58% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LULU

22.88%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.88% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ANF vs. LULU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolANFLULU
Return on Equity (TTM)42.73%42.05%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.69%24.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.61%16.38%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.58%22.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)62.71%59.10%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ANF

1.43

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.81
Median
1.38
Q1
1.15
Min
0.52

ANF’s Current Ratio of 1.43 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LULU

2.27

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.27 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ANF vs. LULU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ANF

0.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
1.57
Median
0.60
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, ANF’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ANF vs. LULU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ANF

3.61

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
39.12
Median
14.13
Q1
3.63
Min
-36.00

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, ANF’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.61 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ANF vs. LULU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolANFLULU
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.432.27
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.860.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.61-47.83

Growth

Revenue Growth

ANF vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ANF vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ANF

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANF currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ANF vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ANF

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
192.64%
Q3
79.43%
Median
26.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANF has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ANF vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolANFLULU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ANF

6.55

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
47.04
Q3
27.74
Median
23.51
Q1
13.77
Min
7.47

ANF’s P/E Ratio of 6.55 is below the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

LULU

12.01

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 12.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ANF vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ANF

0.69

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
2.79
Median
1.21
Q1
0.53
Min
0.09

ANF’s P/S Ratio of 0.69 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LULU

1.97

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 1.97 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ANF vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ANF

3.65

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.92
Median
3.98
Q1
1.86
Min
0.55

ANF’s P/B Ratio of 3.65 is within the conventional range for the Specialty Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LULU

5.37

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 5.37 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ANF vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolANFLULU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)6.5512.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.691.97
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.655.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.8714.90