ANET vs. VRSN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ANET and VRSN, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ANET dominates in value with a market cap of 116.08 billion USD, eclipsing VRSN’s 26.39 billion USD by roughly 4.40×.
ANET’s beta of 1.39 points to much larger expected swings compared to VRSN’s calmer 0.80, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | ANET | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Arista Networks, Inc. | VeriSign, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Ms. Jayshree V. Ullal | Mr. D. James Bidzos |
| Price | 92.43 USD | 281.08 USD |
| Market Cap | 116.08 billion USD | 26.39 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.39 | 0.80 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | June 6, 2014 | January 30, 1998 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ANET and VRSN over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ANET and VRSN based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- VRSN shows a negative forward PEG of -0.34, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ANET at 2.11 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- VRSN carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -18.93, indicating negative equity. In contrast, ANET (P/B 11.51) has positive book value.
| Symbol | ANET | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 38.46 | 33.62 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.11 | -0.34 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 15.61 | 16.75 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 11.51 | -18.93 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.67 | 29.12 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 35.66 | 24.24 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 15.36 | 17.53 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 30.18 | 30.46 |
Dividend Comparison
ANET offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while VRSN provides a 0.27% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ANET | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.27% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ANET and VRSN, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- VRSN’s current ratio of 0.56 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ANET at 3.93 maintains healthy liquidity.
- VRSN posts a quick ratio of 0.56, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ANET at 3.31 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- VRSN has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -1.28), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas ANET at 0.00 preserves healthier equity coverage.
- VRSN carries a debt-to-assets ratio of 1.24, suggesting substantial asset funding via debt, while ANET at 0.00 opts for a more conservative financing structure.
- ANET shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas VRSN (at 13.94) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ANET | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 3.93 | 0.56 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 3.31 | 0.56 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | -1.28 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 13.94 |