Seek Returns logo

ANET vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ANET and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolANETUBER
Company NameArista Networks IncUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization162.40 billion USD191.69 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 6, 2014May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ANET and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ANET vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolANETUBER
5-Day Price Return-4.29%-2.64%
13-Week Price Return-4.32%-1.06%
26-Week Price Return35.08%-0.11%
52-Week Price Return32.98%28.75%
Month-to-Date Return-16.69%-5.06%
Year-to-Date Return18.85%51.89%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.78M20.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.86M17.13M
3-Month Volatility46.66%30.03%
Beta1.441.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ANET

31.28%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
31.28%
Q3
24.67%
Median
13.12%
Q1
4.60%
Min
-12.73%

In the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ANET’s Return on Equity of 31.28% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UBER

70.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.31%
Q3
13.97%
Median
9.07%
Q1
6.97%
Min
1.90%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 70.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ANET

39.73%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
28.72%
Q3
14.02%
Median
5.41%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-13.11%

ANET’s Net Profit Margin of 39.73% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UBER

33.54%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
33.54%
Q3
16.85%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.37%
Min
-12.12%

A Net Profit Margin of 33.54% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ANET

42.88%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
33.69%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.02%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-4.94%

ANET’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.88% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

UBER

8.72%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
24.00%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.11%
Min
-12.12%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.72% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolANETUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)31.28%70.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)21.26%29.80%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)39.73%33.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)42.88%8.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.34%34.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

3.25

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.28
Q3
2.10
Median
1.52
Q1
1.17
Min
0.91

ANET’s Current Ratio of 3.25 is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

UBER

1.15

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.32
Median
1.02
Q1
0.74
Min
0.39

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.15 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

0.00

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.96
Median
0.43
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ANET’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.52
Median
0.99
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ANET

171.78

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
8.92
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 171.78, ANET demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolANETUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.251.15
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.481.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)171.78-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

ANET vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ANET vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
2.99%
Q3
2.30%
Median
0.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.61%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.75%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
61.16%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
76.66%
Median
45.70%
Q1
15.53%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolANETUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ANET

49.29

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
74.67
Q3
56.42
Median
31.00
Q1
15.93
Min
3.89

ANET’s P/E Ratio of 49.29 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

11.39

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.48
Q3
25.52
Median
16.81
Q1
12.10
Min
5.45

In the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s P/E Ratio of 11.39 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ANET

19.58

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.84
Q3
5.68
Median
2.55
Q1
1.24
Min
0.40

With a P/S Ratio of 19.58, ANET trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UBER

3.82

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
3.82
Q3
2.15
Median
1.37
Q1
0.81
Min
0.19

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 3.82 is in the upper echelon for the Ground Transportation industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

15.38

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.02
Q3
6.01
Median
3.83
Q1
2.41
Min
0.42

At 15.38, ANET’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UBER

7.26

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.11
Median
1.41
Q1
1.18
Min
0.69

At 7.26, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolANETUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)49.2911.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)19.583.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)15.387.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.8921.89