Seek Returns logo

ANET vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ANET and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolANETUBER
Company NameArista Networks IncUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization165.24 billion USD195.47 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 6, 2014May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ANET and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ANET vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolANETUBER
5-Day Price Return-3.67%2.55%
13-Week Price Return35.96%1.37%
26-Week Price Return19.79%16.74%
52-Week Price Return49.36%26.35%
Month-to-Date Return6.70%6.81%
Year-to-Date Return18.95%55.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.29M18.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume9.86M20.55M
3-Month Volatility53.44%29.59%
Beta1.481.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ANET

32.30%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

ANET’s Return on Equity of 32.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ANET

40.89%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

ANET’s Net Profit Margin of 40.89% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ANET

43.14%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

ANET’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.14% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolANETUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)32.30%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)22.45%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)40.89%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)43.14%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.24%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

3.33

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

ANET’s Current Ratio of 3.33 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

0.00

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ANET’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ANET

171.78

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

ANET’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 171.78 is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolANETUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.331.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.580.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)171.78-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

ANET vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ANET vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolANETUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ANET

51.33

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

A P/E Ratio of 51.33 places ANET in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ANET

20.99

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

With a P/S Ratio of 20.99, ANET trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

11.79

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

At 11.79, ANET’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolANETUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)51.3315.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)20.994.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)11.798.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.9822.90