Seek Returns logo

ANET vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ANET and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

UBER’s market capitalization of 195.80 billion USD is significantly greater than ANET’s 128.76 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.38 for ANET and 1.39 for UBER, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolANETUBER
Company NameArista Networks, Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryComputer HardwareSoftware - Application
CEOJayshree V. UllalDara Khosrowshahi
Price102.52 USD93.63 USD
Market Cap128.76 billion USD195.80 billion USD
Beta1.381.39
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateJune 6, 2014May 10, 2019
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ANET and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ANET vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ANET

32.05%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
123.03%
Q3
15.78%
Median
-13.44%
Q1
-119.16%
Min
-227.95%

In the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, ANET’s Return on Equity of 32.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UBER

69.55%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 69.55% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software - Application industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Computer Hardware and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ANET

23.89%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
30.37%
Q3
20.44%
Median
7.03%
Q1
-12.47%
Min
-31.70%

In the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, ANET’s Return on Invested Capital of 23.89% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

UBER

18.41%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

In the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, UBER’s Return on Invested Capital of 18.41% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Computer Hardware and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ANET

40.72%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
40.72%
Q3
10.87%
Median
4.33%
Q1
-378.64%
Min
-753.20%

A Net Profit Margin of 40.72% places ANET in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

27.07%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

A Net Profit Margin of 27.07% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Computer Hardware and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ANET

42.27%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
13.53%
Median
4.56%
Q1
-295.01%
Min
-592.84%

An Operating Profit Margin of 42.27% places ANET in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UBER

8.49%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.49% is around the midpoint for the Software - Application industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Computer Hardware and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolANETUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)32.05%69.55%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.86%23.26%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)23.89%18.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)40.72%27.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)42.27%8.49%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.09%39.58%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ANET

3.93

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
20.73
Q3
11.54
Median
2.69
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

ANET’s Current Ratio of 3.93 aligns with the median group of the Computer Hardware industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.02

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.02 falls into the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Computer Hardware and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ANET

--

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.67
Median
0.04
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for ANET is currently unavailable.

UBER

0.51

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 is typical for the Software - Application industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Computer Hardware and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ANET

--

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
32.50
Q3
21.85
Median
4.98
Q1
-7.71
Min
-34.24

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ANET is currently unavailable.

UBER

7.65

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

UBER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.65 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software - Application industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Computer Hardware and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolANETUBER
Current Ratio (TTM)3.931.02
Quick Ratio (TTM)3.311.02
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)--0.51
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)--0.21
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.580.81
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--7.65

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ANET and UBER. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ANET

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.24%
Q3
1.58%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Computer Hardware and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ANET

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
193.79%
Q3
30.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Computer Hardware and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolANETUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ANET

42.66

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
24.60
Q3
24.01
Median
20.31
Q1
18.24
Min
13.38

At 42.66, ANET’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Computer Hardware industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UBER

15.95

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

In the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry, UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.95 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Computer Hardware and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ANET

1.80

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.77
Q3
5.18
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

UBER

0.73

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

UBER’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.73 is within the middle range of its peers in the Software - Application industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Computer Hardware and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ANET

17.31

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
57.61
Q3
47.40
Median
3.37
Q1
1.56
Min
0.43

ANET’s P/S Ratio of 17.31 aligns with the market consensus for the Computer Hardware industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

4.31

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 4.31 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Computer Hardware and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ANET

12.77

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
21.21
Q3
14.71
Median
9.28
Q1
3.74
Min
0.43

ANET’s P/B Ratio of 12.77 is within the conventional range for the Computer Hardware industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER

8.92

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

ANET vs. UBER: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Computer Hardware and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolANETUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)42.6615.95
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.800.73
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)17.314.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)12.778.92
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)34.0225.15
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)39.6227.40
EV-to-Sales (TTM)17.074.45