ANET vs. SONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 27, 2025

Here’s a clear look at ANET and SONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ANET is a standard domestic listing, while SONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	ANET	SONY
Company Name	Arista Networks Inc	Sony Group Corporation
Country	United States	Japan
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Communications Equipment	Household Durables
Market Capitalization	167.21 billion USD	169.87 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 6, 2014	February 21, 1973
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ANET and SONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ANET vs. SONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	ANET	SONY
5-Day Price Return	0.20%	0.91%
13-Week Price Return	43.73%	15.52%
26-Week Price Return	28.02%	23.78%
52-Week Price Return	51.11%	13.72%
Month-to-Date Return	7.97%	14.64%
Year-to-Date Return	20.37%	25.29%
10-Day Avg. Volume	7.27M	16.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume	9.72M	14.24M
3-Month Volatility	52.78%	30.48%
Beta	1.48	1.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ANET

32.30%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 32.05%
Q3: 19.58%
Median: 11.77%
Q1: 2.23%
Min: -11.93%

ANET’s Return on Equity of 32.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 26.99%
Q3: 17.28%
Median: 12.66%
Q1: 7.34%
Min: 0.07%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ANET vs. SONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ANET

40.89%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 23.65%
Q3: 14.32%
Median: 5.31%
Q1: 1.45%
Min: -12.72%

ANET’s Net Profit Margin of 40.89% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 15.50%
Q3: 8.99%
Median: 6.57%
Q1: 4.33%
Min: -0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.13% places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ANET vs. SONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ANET

43.14%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 42.27%
Q3: 18.90%
Median: 6.21%
Q1: 2.97%
Min: -20.72%

ANET’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.14% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 20.22%
Q3: 12.29%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 6.30%
Min: -1.92%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ANET vs. SONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	ANET	SONY
Return on Equity (TTM)	32.30%	14.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)	22.45%	3.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	40.89%	9.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	43.14%	11.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	64.24%	31.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

3.33

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 1.72
Q3: 1.72
Median: 1.46
Q1: 1.18
Min: 0.93

ANET’s Current Ratio of 3.33 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max: 9.23
Q3: 4.50
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.29
Min: 0.70

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ANET vs. SONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

0.00

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 1.55
Q3: 0.92
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ANET’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.84
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.19
Min: 0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ANET vs. SONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ANET

171.78

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 181.73
Q3: 113.63
Median: 7.59
Q1: 3.82
Min: -5.39

ANET’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 171.78 is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 77.14
Median: 24.53
Q1: 5.69
Min: -17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ANET vs. SONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	ANET	SONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)	3.33	1.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	2.58	1.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.00	0.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	171.78	104.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

ANET vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ANET vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 3.88%
Q3: 2.75%
Median: 0.93%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ANET currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SONY

0.47%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 8.95%
Q3: 4.19%
Median: 1.88%
Q1: 0.03%
Min: 0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ANET vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 111.16%
Q3: 55.91%
Median: 28.42%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ANET has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 125.12%
Q3: 62.43%
Median: 39.18%
Q1: 5.55%
Min: 0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ANET vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	ANET	SONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	10.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ANET

51.33

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 57.30
Q3: 47.92
Median: 27.50
Q1: 17.89
Min: 13.89

A P/E Ratio of 51.33 places ANET in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SONY

22.21

Household Durables Industry

Max: 29.75
Q3: 18.88
Median: 13.25
Q1: 9.26
Min: 6.32

A P/E Ratio of 22.21 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ANET vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ANET

20.99

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 11.03
Q3: 5.53
Median: 2.20
Q1: 0.99
Min: 0.40

With a P/S Ratio of 20.99, ANET trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SONY

2.03

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.12
Q3: 1.21
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.51
Min: 0.18

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ANET vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

11.79

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.60
Median: 3.73
Q1: 2.67
Min: 0.30

At 11.79, ANET’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.29
Median: 1.34
Q1: 0.98
Min: 0.59

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ANET vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	ANET	SONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	51.33	22.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	20.99	2.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	11.79	2.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	41.98	12.66