Seek Returns logo

ANET vs. SAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ANET and SAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ANET is a standard domestic listing, while SAP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolANETSAP
Company NameArista Networks IncSAP SE
CountryUnited StatesGermany
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentSoftware
Market Capitalization197.78 billion USD322.77 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 6, 2014September 18, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ANET and SAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ANET vs. SAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolANETSAP
5-Day Price Return8.93%3.16%
13-Week Price Return48.06%-11.49%
26-Week Price Return120.79%1.64%
52-Week Price Return60.34%13.06%
Month-to-Date Return8.00%3.12%
Year-to-Date Return42.37%-0.55%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.36M1.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume9.31M1.48M
3-Month Volatility51.95%29.10%
Beta1.390.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ANET

32.30%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
20.90%
Median
9.10%
Q1
4.29%
Min
-13.50%

In the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ANET’s Return on Equity of 32.30% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SAP

15.09%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

SAP’s Return on Equity of 15.09% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ANET vs. SAP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ANET

40.89%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
12.56%
Median
5.62%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-3.09%

ANET’s Net Profit Margin of 40.89% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

SAP

18.23%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

SAP’s Net Profit Margin of 18.23% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ANET vs. SAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ANET

43.14%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
25.23%
Q3
13.72%
Median
6.44%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-10.95%

ANET’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.14% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

SAP

25.13%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.13% places SAP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ANET vs. SAP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolANETSAP
Return on Equity (TTM)32.30%15.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)22.45%9.09%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)40.89%18.23%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)43.14%25.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.24%73.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

3.33

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
2.13
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.91

ANET’s Current Ratio of 3.33 is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

SAP

1.03

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

SAP’s Current Ratio of 1.03 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ANET vs. SAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

0.00

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.86
Median
0.53
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ANET’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SAP

0.21

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

SAP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ANET vs. SAP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ANET

171.78

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
7.59
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 171.78, ANET demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SAP

32.64

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

SAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 32.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ANET vs. SAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolANETSAP
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.331.03
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.581.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)171.7832.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

ANET vs. SAP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ANET vs. SAP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
8.13%
Q3
3.29%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SAP

1.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.00% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

ANET vs. SAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
70.91%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SAP

161.64%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 161.64%, SAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

ANET vs. SAP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolANETSAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%161.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ANET

56.16

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
103.74
Q3
61.65
Median
26.20
Q1
18.12
Min
4.19

ANET’s P/E Ratio of 56.16 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SAP

41.92

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

SAP’s P/E Ratio of 41.92 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ANET vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ANET

22.97

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.86
Q3
6.24
Median
2.44
Q1
1.02
Min
0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 22.97, ANET trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SAP

7.64

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

SAP’s P/S Ratio of 7.64 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ANET vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

11.79

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.28
Q3
5.73
Median
3.32
Q1
2.02
Min
0.42

At 11.79, ANET’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SAP

7.74

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

SAP’s P/B Ratio of 7.74 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ANET vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolANETSAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)56.1641.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)22.977.64
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)11.797.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)45.9437.51